Is Nonconservative work negative?

  • Thread starter Thread starter guyvsdcsniper
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Negative Work
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the confusion regarding the calculation of thermal energy produced during a physics problem involving a car and friction. The teacher's solution indicated -147,000J for thermal energy, while the textbook stated it as 147,000J. It was clarified that the work done by friction is negative, indicating energy removal, while the thermal energy produced is positive, resulting from the conversion of this removed energy. The equations used highlight that non-conservative work, like friction, typically results in negative values, but there are exceptions where non-conservative forces can do positive work. Ultimately, the thermal energy produced is confirmed to be +147,000J, aligning with the book's answer.
guyvsdcsniper
Messages
264
Reaction score
37
Homework Statement
The car in the figure reaches a vertical height of 25 m on the second hill before coming to a momentary stop. It traveled a total distance of 400 m. Determine the thermal energy produced and estimate the average friction force (assume it is roughly constant) on the car, whose mass is 1000 kg.
Relevant Equations
Wnet=Wc+WNC
I am a bit confused. My teacher solved this problem and his answer for the thermal energy produced was -147,000J. My book says it is 147000J. My teacher used the equation K2+P2=K1+P1+Wnc and my book used K1+P1=K2+P2+Wnc.

Which one is it?

Screen Shot 2021-03-18 at 7.10.47 AM.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Friction force has opposite direction to velocity of car so
W:work which friction force does on the car has negative sign.
W=\int \mathbf{F}\cdot \mathbf{v} dt < 0
P1+W=P2 so P1> P2. The car stops at lower position. You observe car energy change.

Q:The thermal energy floor got by giving minus work
Q=-W > 0
P1=P2+Q
You observe car and floor energy conservation.

You may choose to use negative W or positive Q of same amount.
 
Last edited:
Total energy does not change, ##\Delta E_{total}=0##. From the starting point at height 40 m to the final height of 25 m the only energy changes are gravitational potential, ##\Delta U_{grav}## and thermal, ##\Delta E_{therm}##. Thus, $$0=\Delta E_{total}=\Delta U_{grav}+\Delta E_{therm}~\Rightarrow~\Delta E_{therm}=-\Delta U_{grav}.$$Now $$\Delta U_{grav}=mgh_{\text{f}}-mgh_{\text{i}}=mg(h_{\text{f}}-h_{\text{i}})=1000\times 9.8(-15)~\text{J}=-147,000~\text{J}.$$Thus, ##\Delta E_{therm}=+147,000~\text{J}.## The thermal energy increases which makes sense because the track's and the car's temperatures rise.

Note: Here we considered a three-part closed system consisting of the car the track and the Earth.
 
Last edited:
quittingthecult said:
I am a bit confused. My teacher solved this problem and his answer for the thermal energy produced was -147,000J. My book says it is 147000J. My teacher used the equation K2+P2=K1+P1+Wnc and my book used K1+P1=K2+P2+Wnc.

Which one is it?
The question specifically asks for the ‘thermal energy produced’ (Q). This will be a positive value.

The work done by friction (W) will be a negative value, because friction and displacement are in opposite directions. A negative value for W tells us that friction has removed mechanical energy.

In this problem: Q = -W.

Friction has removed 147,000J (hence W = -147,000J). What has friction done with this removed energy? - it has converted it to thermal energy, so thermal energy produced = +147,000J.

Personally I would use:
P1 + K1 + W = P2 + K2 (remembering W is negative here and Q = -W)

To answer the question-title: “Is Non-conservative work negative?”
Not necessarily. Friction/resistance forces do negative work because force and displacement are in opposite directions. That’s the most common situation. But (in the right circumstances) a magnetic field is a non-conservative force which can do positive work. I’m sure there are other example of non-conservative work being positive.

EDIT: A discussion (off-topic) about whether a magnetic field can do work (e.g. in an electric motor) followed this post. This has now been moved to a separate thread: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/magnetic-fields-and-work.1001067/
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top