Is Nonconservative work negative?

  • Thread starter Thread starter guyvsdcsniper
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Negative Work
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of nonconservative work, specifically in the context of energy transformations involving friction and thermal energy. Participants are examining the discrepancies between a teacher's solution and a textbook regarding the sign and magnitude of thermal energy produced in a mechanical system involving a car and a track.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relationship between work done by friction and the resulting thermal energy, questioning the signs associated with these quantities. They discuss the equations used to analyze energy conservation and the implications of negative work.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of the definitions and implications of nonconservative work, particularly in relation to friction. Some participants have provided insights into how negative work relates to energy conversion, while others are still seeking clarity on the correct application of the equations involved.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the specific context of the problem, including the closed system involving the car, track, and Earth, and the importance of understanding the signs of work and energy in this scenario. There is also mention of a related but separate discussion regarding magnetic fields and work, indicating a broader exploration of nonconservative forces.

guyvsdcsniper
Messages
264
Reaction score
37
Homework Statement
The car in the figure reaches a vertical height of 25 m on the second hill before coming to a momentary stop. It traveled a total distance of 400 m. Determine the thermal energy produced and estimate the average friction force (assume it is roughly constant) on the car, whose mass is 1000 kg.
Relevant Equations
Wnet=Wc+WNC
I am a bit confused. My teacher solved this problem and his answer for the thermal energy produced was -147,000J. My book says it is 147000J. My teacher used the equation K2+P2=K1+P1+Wnc and my book used K1+P1=K2+P2+Wnc.

Which one is it?

Screen Shot 2021-03-18 at 7.10.47 AM.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Friction force has opposite direction to velocity of car so
W:work which friction force does on the car has negative sign.
W=\int \mathbf{F}\cdot \mathbf{v} dt < 0
P1+W=P2 so P1> P2. The car stops at lower position. You observe car energy change.

Q:The thermal energy floor got by giving minus work
Q=-W > 0
P1=P2+Q
You observe car and floor energy conservation.

You may choose to use negative W or positive Q of same amount.
 
Last edited:
Total energy does not change, ##\Delta E_{total}=0##. From the starting point at height 40 m to the final height of 25 m the only energy changes are gravitational potential, ##\Delta U_{grav}## and thermal, ##\Delta E_{therm}##. Thus, $$0=\Delta E_{total}=\Delta U_{grav}+\Delta E_{therm}~\Rightarrow~\Delta E_{therm}=-\Delta U_{grav}.$$Now $$\Delta U_{grav}=mgh_{\text{f}}-mgh_{\text{i}}=mg(h_{\text{f}}-h_{\text{i}})=1000\times 9.8(-15)~\text{J}=-147,000~\text{J}.$$Thus, ##\Delta E_{therm}=+147,000~\text{J}.## The thermal energy increases which makes sense because the track's and the car's temperatures rise.

Note: Here we considered a three-part closed system consisting of the car the track and the Earth.
 
Last edited:
quittingthecult said:
I am a bit confused. My teacher solved this problem and his answer for the thermal energy produced was -147,000J. My book says it is 147000J. My teacher used the equation K2+P2=K1+P1+Wnc and my book used K1+P1=K2+P2+Wnc.

Which one is it?
The question specifically asks for the ‘thermal energy produced’ (Q). This will be a positive value.

The work done by friction (W) will be a negative value, because friction and displacement are in opposite directions. A negative value for W tells us that friction has removed mechanical energy.

In this problem: Q = -W.

Friction has removed 147,000J (hence W = -147,000J). What has friction done with this removed energy? - it has converted it to thermal energy, so thermal energy produced = +147,000J.

Personally I would use:
P1 + K1 + W = P2 + K2 (remembering W is negative here and Q = -W)

To answer the question-title: “Is Non-conservative work negative?”
Not necessarily. Friction/resistance forces do negative work because force and displacement are in opposite directions. That’s the most common situation. But (in the right circumstances) a magnetic field is a non-conservative force which can do positive work. I’m sure there are other example of non-conservative work being positive.

EDIT: A discussion (off-topic) about whether a magnetic field can do work (e.g. in an electric motor) followed this post. This has now been moved to a separate thread: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/magnetic-fields-and-work.1001067/
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
33
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K