Is Nonconservative work negative?

  • Thread starter Thread starter guyvsdcsniper
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Negative Work
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion clarifies the confusion surrounding the thermal energy produced by non-conservative work, specifically in the context of friction. The teacher's calculation of -147,000J for thermal energy is corrected to +147,000J based on the principle that the work done by friction (W) is negative, indicating energy removal. The equations used include K2 + P2 = K1 + P1 + Wnc and K1 + P1 = K2 + P2 + Wnc, emphasizing that thermal energy produced (Q) is equal to -W. The conclusion is that while non-conservative work is typically negative, it can be positive under certain conditions, such as with magnetic fields.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the work-energy principle
  • Familiarity with non-conservative forces and their effects
  • Knowledge of gravitational potential energy calculations
  • Basic grasp of thermodynamics and energy conservation
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the work-energy theorem in detail
  • Learn about non-conservative forces and their applications
  • Investigate the role of friction in energy transfer
  • Explore the concept of magnetic fields doing work in electric motors
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, educators teaching energy concepts, and anyone interested in understanding the implications of non-conservative work in mechanical systems.

guyvsdcsniper
Messages
264
Reaction score
37
Homework Statement
The car in the figure reaches a vertical height of 25 m on the second hill before coming to a momentary stop. It traveled a total distance of 400 m. Determine the thermal energy produced and estimate the average friction force (assume it is roughly constant) on the car, whose mass is 1000 kg.
Relevant Equations
Wnet=Wc+WNC
I am a bit confused. My teacher solved this problem and his answer for the thermal energy produced was -147,000J. My book says it is 147000J. My teacher used the equation K2+P2=K1+P1+Wnc and my book used K1+P1=K2+P2+Wnc.

Which one is it?

Screen Shot 2021-03-18 at 7.10.47 AM.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Friction force has opposite direction to velocity of car so
W:work which friction force does on the car has negative sign.
W=\int \mathbf{F}\cdot \mathbf{v} dt < 0
P1+W=P2 so P1> P2. The car stops at lower position. You observe car energy change.

Q:The thermal energy floor got by giving minus work
Q=-W > 0
P1=P2+Q
You observe car and floor energy conservation.

You may choose to use negative W or positive Q of same amount.
 
Last edited:
Total energy does not change, ##\Delta E_{total}=0##. From the starting point at height 40 m to the final height of 25 m the only energy changes are gravitational potential, ##\Delta U_{grav}## and thermal, ##\Delta E_{therm}##. Thus, $$0=\Delta E_{total}=\Delta U_{grav}+\Delta E_{therm}~\Rightarrow~\Delta E_{therm}=-\Delta U_{grav}.$$Now $$\Delta U_{grav}=mgh_{\text{f}}-mgh_{\text{i}}=mg(h_{\text{f}}-h_{\text{i}})=1000\times 9.8(-15)~\text{J}=-147,000~\text{J}.$$Thus, ##\Delta E_{therm}=+147,000~\text{J}.## The thermal energy increases which makes sense because the track's and the car's temperatures rise.

Note: Here we considered a three-part closed system consisting of the car the track and the Earth.
 
Last edited:
quittingthecult said:
I am a bit confused. My teacher solved this problem and his answer for the thermal energy produced was -147,000J. My book says it is 147000J. My teacher used the equation K2+P2=K1+P1+Wnc and my book used K1+P1=K2+P2+Wnc.

Which one is it?
The question specifically asks for the ‘thermal energy produced’ (Q). This will be a positive value.

The work done by friction (W) will be a negative value, because friction and displacement are in opposite directions. A negative value for W tells us that friction has removed mechanical energy.

In this problem: Q = -W.

Friction has removed 147,000J (hence W = -147,000J). What has friction done with this removed energy? - it has converted it to thermal energy, so thermal energy produced = +147,000J.

Personally I would use:
P1 + K1 + W = P2 + K2 (remembering W is negative here and Q = -W)

To answer the question-title: “Is Non-conservative work negative?”
Not necessarily. Friction/resistance forces do negative work because force and displacement are in opposite directions. That’s the most common situation. But (in the right circumstances) a magnetic field is a non-conservative force which can do positive work. I’m sure there are other example of non-conservative work being positive.

EDIT: A discussion (off-topic) about whether a magnetic field can do work (e.g. in an electric motor) followed this post. This has now been moved to a separate thread: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/magnetic-fields-and-work.1001067/
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
33
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K