- #1

- 307

- 0

You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

- Thread starter mateomy
- Start date

- #1

- 307

- 0

- #2

mathman

Science Advisor

- 8,008

- 518

It is mainly a matter of convenience not to call 1 a prime. Otherwise many theorems involving prime numbers would have to say "excluding 1". For example every integer can be expressed uniquely as a product of powers of primes. If you included 1, you would have to say "except 1" to have uniqueness.

- #3

- 22,129

- 3,298

No, 1 is not a prime number. This is quite an arbitrary definition, but there are good reasons not to define 1 a prime number.

For example, every number has a unique prime factorization, eg

60=2².3.5

But if 1 is a prime, then this is not true anymore, because

60=2².3.5.1

is then another prime factorization.

There are another quite nice results for which 1 should not be prime. So 1 is not prime. A prime number is in fact, by definiton, a number with exactly two divisors. This definition would exclude 1.

- #4

- 307

- 0

Oh okay, that makes sense. Does anyone have any reading suggestions on primes specifically. I just started reading "Elementary Theory of Numbers" by LeVeque. Any critiques on this, or pointers to another text perhaps?

Thanks.

Share: