Is Orientability Preserved by Local Diffeomorphisms?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Euge
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the mathematical concept of orientability in the context of local diffeomorphisms between smooth manifolds. It establishes that if a local diffeomorphism \( f: M \to N \) exists and manifold \( N \) is orientable, then manifold \( M \) must also be orientable. This conclusion is based on the properties of smooth manifolds and the preservation of orientation through local diffeomorphisms.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of smooth manifolds
  • Knowledge of local diffeomorphisms
  • Familiarity with the concept of orientability
  • Basic principles of differential geometry
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of local diffeomorphisms in differential geometry
  • Explore the implications of orientability in higher-dimensional manifolds
  • Investigate examples of non-orientable manifolds
  • Learn about the relationship between topology and differentiable structures
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, particularly those specializing in differential geometry and topology, as well as students seeking to deepen their understanding of manifold theory and orientability concepts.

Euge
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
Messages
2,072
Reaction score
245
Here is this week's POTW:

-----
Suppose $f : M \to N$ is a local diffeomorphism between two smooth manifolds. Show that orientability of $N$ implies orientability of $M$.

-----

Remember to read the https://mathhelpboards.com/showthread.php?772-Problem-of-the-Week-%28POTW%29-Procedure-and-Guidelines to find out how to https://mathhelpboards.com/forms.php?do=form&fid=2!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No one answered this week's problem. You can read my solution below.
Assume $N$ is orientable. Then $N$ can be expressed as the union of open sets of the form $x_\alpha(U_\alpha)$, where $x_\alpha : U_\alpha \to N$ is a local parametrization in $N$ such that whenever $W_{\alpha\beta}:= x_\alpha(U_\alpha) \cap x_\beta(U_\beta) \neq \emptyset$, the change of coordinates map $x_\beta^{-1}\circ x_\alpha : x_{\alpha}^{-1}(W_{\alpha\beta}) \to x_{\beta}^{-1}(W_{\alpha\beta})$ has positive Jacobian. Let $m\in M$, and $x_m : U_m \to N$ be a local parametrization with $x_m(U_m)\ni f(m)$. Since $f$ is a local diffeomorphism, there exists an open neighborhood $V_m$ of $m$ such that $f(V_m)$ is open in $N$. Consider the open set $Z_m:= x_m^{-1}(x_m(U_m) \cap f(V_m))$. Then $f^{-1}\circ x_m : Z_m \to f^{-1}(x_m(U_m) \cap f(V_m))\subset M$ is a parametrization in $M$.

The collection $\{(Z_m, f^{-1}\circ x_m)\}_{m\in M}$ of parametrizations make an orientable cover of $M$. For if $W_{mn} := Z_m \cap Z_n \neq \emptyset$, the change of variables map $(f^{-1}\circ x_m)^{-1}\circ (f^{-1}\circ x_n) : x_n^{-1}(f^{-1}(W_{mn})) \to x_m^{-1}(f^{-1}(W_{mn}))$ is the map $x_m^{-1}\circ f \circ f^{-1}\circ x_n = x_m^{-1}\circ x_n$, which has positive Jacobian by assumption. Therefore, $M$ is orientable.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K