Is our cloud chamber showing correct tracks from U-238 decay chain?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Jr_Particle_Hunters
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Chain Decay
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the tracks observed in a cloud chamber experiment using a Pb-210 needle source, specifically regarding the decay chain of U-238 and the types of radiation emitted during the decay processes. Participants explore the nature of beta and alpha tracks produced by the decays of Pb-210, Bi-210, and Po-210, as well as the timing and relative amounts of these emissions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that the observed tracks are beta tracks from Pb-210 decaying into Bi-210 and from Bi-210 decaying into Po-210, as well as alpha tracks from Po-210 decaying into stable Pb-206.
  • There is a discussion about whether the tracks are produced continuously and in equal amounts, with some noting that initially only Pb-210 decays would be observed, followed by Bi-210 decays growing over time.
  • Participants mention that after a certain period, the decay rates of the isotopes would approximate equal contributions to the observed tracks.
  • One participant questions the visibility of alpha tracks from Po-210, given its longer half-life, suggesting that decay is a probabilistic process and activity can be observed at any time.
  • There is a clarification that the energies listed for beta decays represent maximal electron energy, and the actual energy can vary, affecting the range of the emitted electrons.
  • Concerns are raised about the purity of the Pb-210 source, with the possibility that other isotopes may contribute to the observed decay tracks.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the types of decays occurring and the probabilistic nature of radioactive decay, but there is no consensus on the exact contributions of each decay type to the observed tracks or the purity of the source material.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes assumptions about the initial purity of the Pb-210 source and the timing of observations, which may affect the interpretation of the decay tracks. The variability in decay energy and track visibility is also noted but remains unresolved.

Jr_Particle_Hunters
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Hi. We are using a Pb-210 needle source for our cloud chamber science project. Are we correct that the tracks we are seeing inside the chamber radiating off the needle are:

1) Beta tracks from Pb-210 decaying into Bi-210 (in the .063 MeV range)
2) Beta tracks from Bi-210 decaying into Po-210 (in the 1.1 MeV range)
3) Alpha tracks from Po-210 decaying into stable Pb-206 (in the 5.4 MeV range)

If that is correct, are the tracks being produced continuously and in equal amounts?

Also, does that mean the radioactive decay chain of U-238 starts happening from the very first moment of the U-238's existence and continues to happen without ever stopping until all the atoms become stable lead?

Thanks! We really appreciate your help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Jr_Particle_Hunters said:
If that is correct, are the tracks being produced continuously and in equal amounts?
If you start with a pure Pb-210 source, initially you only have Pb-210 decays, with Bi-210 decays (half-life 5 days) quickly growing (within days to weeks) as the first atoms decayed to Bi-210. Po-210 has a half-life of 138 days, that needs longer until it reaches the same activity.

If you start with pure U-238, the same arguments apply, initially you don't get all decays in equal amounts, but after a while this is a very good approximation.

Nothing stops until everything decayed to stable nuclei.
 
mfb said:
If you start with a pure Pb-210 source, initially you only have Pb-210 decays, with Bi-210 decays (half-life 5 days) quickly growing (within days to weeks) as the first atoms decayed to Bi-210. Po-210 has a half-life of 138 days, that needs longer until it reaches the same activity.

If you start with pure U-238, the same arguments apply, initially you don't get all decays in equal amounts, but after a while this is a very good approximation.

Nothing stops until everything decayed to stable nuclei.
Thank you for replying so quickly!

Based on what you wrote, so if we bought our needle from a company that used pure Pb-210 to coat the needle head, and we began our experiments about two weeks after receiving it, then we are likely seeing beta tracks from both the Pb-210 decay and Bi-210 decay in almost equal amounts?
(During our experiments, we noticed shorter, faint beta tracks that traveled off the needle, and we also noticed brighter betas that traveled as far as 8 inches off the needle. Is that possibly the two different beta decays, one having a higher MeV?)

Also, why do we see alpha tracks coming off the needle if Po-210 needs longer to decay?
 
Jr_Particle_Hunters said:
Based on what you wrote, so if we bought our needle from a company that used pure Pb-210 to coat the needle head, and we began our experiments about two weeks after receiving it, then we are likely seeing beta tracks from both the Pb-210 decay and Bi-210 decay in almost equal amounts?
Within 15%, yes.
Jr_Particle_Hunters said:
(During our experiments, we noticed shorter, faint beta tracks that traveled off the needle, and we also noticed brighter betas that traveled as far as 8 inches off the needle. Is that possibly the two different beta decays, one having a higher MeV?)
The decay energy in a beta decay is distributed over the neutrino and the electron. The energies you listed are just the maximal electron energy, it can also be lower. In addition, the range of electrons can vary even for the same energy.
Jr_Particle_Hunters said:
Also, why do we see alpha tracks coming off the needle if Po-210 needs longer to decay?
The decay is a probabilistic process. You will see activity all the time, but it will be higher a year after you bought the sample.
Your sample won't be pure Pb-210, other isotopes can contribute to the visible decays.
 
mfb said:
Within 15%, yes.The decay energy in a beta decay is distributed over the neutrino and the electron. The energies you listed are just the maximal electron energy, it can also be lower. In addition, the range of electrons can vary even for the same energy.
The decay is a probabilistic process. You will see activity all the time, but it will be higher a year after you bought the sample.
Your sample won't be pure Pb-210, other isotopes can contribute to the visible decays.

You rock! Thanks!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
7K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
9K