Is Our Solution for Complimentary Unitary Operators Valid?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jfy4
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Operators
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the validity of a solution regarding the polynomial representation of operators in a quantum system defined by complementary unitary operators U and V. The key conclusion is that if the operator O commutes with U, it can only be expressed as a function of U; similarly, if it commutes with V, it can only be a function of V. Furthermore, if O commutes with both U and V, it must be a constant times the identity operator. The confusion arises from the treatment of the summation in the solution, leading to questions about the independence of operator powers.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics and operator theory
  • Familiarity with unitary operators and their properties
  • Knowledge of commutation relations in quantum systems
  • Basic proficiency in mathematical notation used in quantum physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of complementary unitary operators in quantum mechanics
  • Learn about the implications of commutation relations on operator functions
  • Explore the concept of polynomial representations of operators in quantum systems
  • Investigate the independence of operator powers and their implications in quantum theory
USEFUL FOR

Quantum physicists, graduate students in quantum mechanics, and researchers exploring operator theory in quantum systems will benefit from this discussion.

jfy4
Messages
645
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


Consider a quantum system that acts on an N-dimensional space. We showed that any operator could be expressed as a polynomial of the form
[tex] O=\sum_{m,n=1}^{\infty}o_{mn}U^m V^n[/tex]
where [itex]U[/itex] and [itex]V[/itex] are complementary unitary operators satisfying [itex](U^N = V^N =1)[/itex] Show that if [itex]O[/itex] commutes with [itex]U[/itex] this polynomial can only be a function of [itex]U[/itex]; if [itex]O[/itex] commutes with [itex]V[/itex] this polynomial can only be a function of [itex]V[/itex]; and if [itex]O[/itex] commutes with [itex]U[/itex] and [itex]V[/itex] this polynomial must be a constant times the identity

Homework Equations


[tex]UV=VU e^{i2\pi /N}[/tex]
[tex]V^n U=UV^n e^{i2\pi n/N}[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution


Me and some buddies thought we had a solution to this, but then another clever buddy pointed out something that we are all unsure of... can a fellow PF lurker lend a hand here

I solved this by assuming the commutation and writing it out explicitly and using the above relavent equations
[tex] [O,U]=\sum_{m,n=1}^{N}o_{mn}(U^m V^n U-UU^m V^n)=\sum_{m,n=1}^{N}o_{mn}U^{m+1}V^n (e^{i2\pi n/N}-1)=0[/tex]
I then confidently took
[tex] e^{i2\pi n/N}=1\implies n=N[/tex]
which, as stated in the beginning, makes [itex]V^n=V^N=1[/itex] which gives me my polynomial in terms of [itex]U[/itex] only.

Now here is the confusion, there is a summation there in my solution, which seems to make my solution incorrect, since what I wrote doesn't need to be true, just that the sum of the terms needs to add up to zero. Are we missing something obvious, or is that solution simply not valid?

Thanks in advance,
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I would hazard that powers of operators are independent from each other just like normal variables so that absorbing the n dependent factor into the coefficients gives you a statement about the independence of powers of operators

[tex]\Sigma_{m,n=1}^{N} o_{mn} U^{m+1} V^{n} (e^{i2 \pi n/N} - 1) = \Sigma_{m,n=1}^{N} o' (n)_{mn} U^{m+1} V^{n} = 0[/tex]

which is only satisfied when n=N, otherwise O is not general, and so the sum is irrelevant

Hope it is clear
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
3K