Is P(A|B) equal to P(A) if and only if P(B|A) is equal to P(B)?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between conditional probabilities, specifically whether P(A|B) equals P(A) if and only if P(B|A) equals P(B). Participants are exploring the formal proof of this property, engaging in mathematical reasoning and clarification of definitions.

Discussion Character

  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant requests guidance on proving that P(A|B) = P(A) if and only if P(B|A) = P(B).
  • Another participant suggests starting with the definition of conditional probability to clarify the relationship.
  • There are conflicting interpretations regarding the use of intersections versus unions in the definitions of conditional probabilities.
  • A participant expresses confusion over the proof structure, questioning whether the assumptions made lead to the desired conclusions.
  • Another participant emphasizes the need to show that independence in one direction implies independence in the other direction.
  • It is suggested that proving the equivalence requires demonstrating both implications: from P(A|B) = P(A) to P(B|A) = P(B) and vice versa.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the correct approach to the proof, with multiple interpretations and methods proposed. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the formal proof of the stated property.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations in the discussion, including potential misunderstandings about the definitions of conditional probability and the assumptions made in the proof process.

x^2
Messages
19
Reaction score
1
Independent Probability...

Hello,

Could someone point me in the right direction of how to prove that P(A|B) = P(A) if and only if P(B|A) = P(B)? I think I understand the program and I can't formulate any contradictions, but I'm having difficulty showing this property with a formal proof.

Thanks,
x^2
 
Physics news on Phys.org


can you start with the definition

P(A|B) = \frac{P(A \cap B)}{P(B)}
 


P(A|B) = \frac{P(A \cup B)}{P(B)} = P(A)

P(B|A) = \frac{P(A \cup B)}{P(A)} = P(B)

P(B|A) = \frac{P(A \cup B)}{P(B)} = P(A)

P(A|B) = \frac{P(A \cup B)}{P(A)} = \frac{P(A \cup B)}{P(A)} = P(B|A)

I think that is right... Thank you for the hint!
x^2
 


i think you mean intersections, not unions

a better way to show it would be to start with
P(A|B) = P(A)

and use the definition and simplify to show P(B|A) = P(B)
 
Last edited:


lanedance said:
i think you mean intersections, not unions

a better way to show it would be to start with
P(A|B) = P(A|B)

and use the definition and simplify to show P(A) = P(B)

Yes, sorry, you are correct; they should be intersections and not unions.

Thank you for the help!
x^2
 


x^2 said:
P(A|B) = \frac{P(A \cup B)}{P(B)} = P(A)

P(B|A) = \frac{P(A \cup B)}{P(A)} = P(B)

P(B|A) = \frac{P(A \cup B)}{P(B)} = P(A)

P(A|B) = \frac{P(A \cup B)}{P(A)} = \frac{P(A \cup B)}{P(A)} = P(B|A)

I think that is right... Thank you for the hint!
x^2
What is going on in this proof? It looks like you are assuming P(A|B) = P(A) and P(B|A) = P(B) = P(A), and then you don't prove what you set out to prove.

What does P(A|B) = P(A) mean? It means that B's occurring has no effect on the probability of A occurring, i.e., A is independent of B, yes? You need to show that A being independent of B also makes B independent of A. So there is a hint: Do you have a rule that has a different version for independent events?

To prove an equivalence, you can prove the implication both ways: Assume P(A|B) = P(A) and use this to derive P(B|A) = P(B). Then assume P(B|A) = P(B) and use this to derive P(A|B) = P(A).

So the first line in your proof should be

1] P(A|B) = P(A)​

What can you say given also

1] P(A|B) = P(A)
2] P(A ∩ B) = P(B) * P(A|B)​

Remember that you are trying to get to P(B|A) = P(B). So, as a general rule, P(B|A) = ??

Note that A and B are arbitrary events, so the proof in the other direction will be the same.
 


sorry yeah corected post
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K