Is Photographic Memory a Myth? Take the Test and Find Out!

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mentalist
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Memory Test
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers around the effectiveness of the photographic memory test available at Open University, which reportedly takes ten minutes to complete. Participants shared their experiences, with scores ranging from 0% to 70%, indicating varying levels of short-term memory recall. Many users expressed frustration with the test's interface, particularly issues like server errors and the test restarting unexpectedly. Overall, the consensus suggests skepticism regarding the existence of photographic memory, with several users noting their reliance on memorization techniques rather than innate ability.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of short-term memory concepts
  • Familiarity with online psychological testing
  • Knowledge of memorization techniques
  • Basic troubleshooting skills for online tests
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the psychology behind short-term memory and its limitations
  • Explore various memorization techniques, such as chunking and mnemonic devices
  • Investigate the validity of online psychological tests and their design
  • Learn about the neuroscience of memory and cognitive functions
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for psychologists, educators, students of cognitive science, and anyone interested in understanding memory capabilities and testing methodologies.

Physics news on Phys.org
GRRRRR, I had almost completed the test and selected the option to "zoom in" and it restarted the test! I'll try agin later after I'm not angry anymore. I don't believe that I have short term ediectic memory anyway.
 
I scored 10%. Meaning I only got the first and easiest one right. They suggest I may not have this ability.
 
I scored 0%. But I do have a pornographic memory.
 
I got 40% - and an error connecting to the server so I couldn't see which ones I got right. I suspect the first four, since I think I was using rapid memorisation techniques rather than any intuitive ability to just "see a difference".
 
I'm not very confident about my short term memory's ability to ... uh, what were we talking about?
 
10% on the first try, 70% on the 2nd. looking for changes to the biggest continuous block of white squares (& mostly ignoring the rest) seemed to work pretty well on the 2nd try. I don't know if that's cheating or what but those 10x10 squares were too much to take in in such a short time.
 
Last edited:
There is a bit of a learning curve to this. I only got 10% the first time 40% the second.
 
fourier jr said:
10% on the first try, 70% on the 2nd. looking for changes to the biggest continuous block of white squares (& mostly ignoring the rest) seemed to work pretty well on the 2nd try.

LOL I tried to keep up with changes in the two biggest blocks of white squares.
 
  • #10
I also got a server error, but then it said my score was 20%. I was surprised, I was expecting 0%.
 
  • #11
20% but I think it's because I typed the wrong number a few times. Could that test have been any more boring?
 
  • #12
Got to question 4 or so and quit. 0% and I couldn't even attempt to guess any of them. Literally had no idea.
 
  • #13
I've been wanting to take this test but forgot where I saw it.
 
  • #14
20% also
 
  • #15
I thought it was common knowledge that photographic memory is a myth?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 50 ·
2
Replies
50
Views
11K
  • · Replies 81 ·
3
Replies
81
Views
12K
  • · Replies 60 ·
3
Replies
60
Views
10K