Is physics utilized in AI research? If so, how?

Click For Summary
Artificial Intelligence (AI) research is primarily driven by computer scientists and mathematicians, although physicists have contributed to the discourse, particularly in philosophical contexts. Notably, Roger Penrose's work, while touching on consciousness, is more aligned with the philosophy of science than direct AI applications. Some discussions highlight the potential of quantum physics to enhance AI technology, indicating a growing interest in interdisciplinary approaches. The integration of physics into AI research appears to be an emerging trend, particularly in exploring non-algorithmic aspects of human consciousness. Overall, the intersection of physics and AI is gaining attention, suggesting a broader collaborative future in research.
jaskamiin
Messages
23
Reaction score
1
It seems to me on the forefront that Artificial Intelligence research is more of the computer scientist's and mathematician's game, but I seem to recall reading a couple of books written by physicists on the subject as well (including Penrose's The Emperor's New Mind).

Is this a popular trend? What areas of physics are most commonly utilized in that area?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
jaskamiin said:
It seems to me on the forefront that Artificial Intelligence research is more of the computer scientist's and mathematician's game, but I seem to recall reading a couple of books written by physicists on the subject as well (including Penrose's The Emperor's New Mind).

Is this a popular trend? What areas of physics are most commonly utilized in that area?
Penrose's books are about consciousness not AI. And I think for now, we should classify them under philosophy of science.
The part of his ideas that relate to AI, is that human consciousness is non-algorithmic which means it can't be modeled by (at least current) methods in AI. But I'm not sure what he means by consciousness. I haven't read about his ideas much.
 

Thread 'Does acceleration affect impact energy vs constant velocity?'

I do not have a good working knowledge of physics yet. I tried to piece this together but after researching this, I couldn’t figure out the correct laws of physics to combine to develop a formula to answer this question. Ex. 1 - A moving object impacts a static object at a constant velocity. Ex. 2 - A moving object impacts a static object at the same velocity but is accelerating at the moment of impact. Assuming the mass of the objects is the same and the velocity at the moment of impact...
View full post »

Similar threads

Current and Future AI Threats to Humanity and the Human Response
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
Which Fields of Physics Utilize Topology and Geometry in Modern Research?
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Physics What job is better Theoretical Physics or AI?
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
Studying Self-studying plan for modern science
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
High School Can you solve Penrose's chess problem and win a bonus prize?
  • · Replies 179 ·
6
Replies
179
Views
27K
Can an AI write a credible novel with Wikipedia and YouTube?
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Graduate PDE: Between Physics and Mathematics
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
Physics What is a typical day like for a theoretical researcher?
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
6K
Resources with learning strategies for students of physics
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
How to surround myself with other physicists/students outside of academia?
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K