tribdog
- 768
- 17
mine's not, don't know about yours
The discussion revolves around the classification of Pluto as a planet following the International Astronomical Union's decision to redefine what constitutes a planet. Participants explore the implications of this decision on scientific classification, public perception, and even astrology, reflecting on the broader consequences of such a change in the context of the solar system.
Participants generally disagree on the implications and validity of the IAU's decision regarding Pluto's status. Multiple competing views remain about the scientific rationale behind the classification and its broader consequences.
Limitations include the lack of a clear definition for Kuiper Belt objects and the implications of classification on ongoing and future astronomical discoveries. The discussion reflects a range of opinions on the adequacy of the IAU's criteria and the historical context of planetary classification.
Readers interested in astronomy, planetary science, and the philosophical implications of scientific classification may find this discussion relevant.
DaveC426913 said:It's a black hole.
D H said:http://www.mercurynews.com/mld/mercurynews/news/local/states/california/northern_california/16405925.htm"
"Plutoed" was chosen 2006 Word of the Year by the American Dialect Society at its annual meeting on Friday.
To "pluto" is "to demote or devalue someone or something" much like what happened to the former planet last year when the General Assembly of the International Astronomical Union decided Pluto didn't meet its definition of a planet.