Is Pursuing Quantum Computing Feasible with a Mechanical Engineering Background?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the feasibility of pursuing a career in quantum computing for an undergraduate student with a background in Mechanical Engineering and Physics. It explores the challenges of transitioning into quantum computing, particularly regarding the necessary mathematical and computer science knowledge, as well as the potential paths to graduate school in this emerging field.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses a strong interest in quantum computing, particularly in its theoretical and algorithmic aspects, despite the constraints of their Mechanical Engineering coursework.
  • Another participant suggests that directly approaching researchers in the field and exploring journal articles may be beneficial for finding a suitable path in graduate school.
  • A different viewpoint emphasizes the importance of researching theoretical computer science and cryptography, as these areas are relevant to quantum computing.
  • Concerns are raised about the competitive nature of the quantum computing field, particularly in the mathematical and algorithmic domains, which have been established for decades.
  • One participant warns that having a Mechanical Engineering background may pose challenges in acquiring the necessary knowledge and credentials, as exams are typically required to demonstrate proficiency in relevant subjects.
  • There is a cautionary note regarding the limited number of permanent positions in quantum computing, suggesting that students should remain flexible in their career aspirations within physics.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a mix of support and caution regarding the pursuit of quantum computing. While some suggest proactive approaches to research and learning, others highlight significant challenges and limitations based on the participant's current academic trajectory.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of relevant coursework in math and computer science, which the original poster may be unable to complete due to scheduling constraints. There is also a recognition of the competitive nature of the quantum computing field and the necessity of demonstrating knowledge through formal assessments.

Abhishek Sethi
Messages
9
Reaction score
1
Hi,

I am an undergraduate student from India. Pursuing double major in Physics and Mechanical Engineering.

I have completed 4 semesters(2 years) of my college. I had taken a class titled "Quantum information and computing" and it interested me a lot. I really love math and computations involved.
I am getting interested in theory and algorithms aspect of quantum computing.

My question is, how hard will it be to pursue quantum computing as my field for a grad school (maybe for a PhD), given that I will be doing irrelevant Mechanical Engineering courses.
I cannot take any math or CS classes simply because I won't be having slots which will make me complete my degrees on time (I am planning to complete my classes in 4years and 1 year of thesis).

I understand that I need to relevant math/CS courses, but I will be practically restricted.
However, I can put efforts and study relevant non-physics things on my own.

Another question I want to ask is, how do I proceed with these conditions?
I cannot change my second major to CS, but I can drop Mechanical Engineering and pursue 5 classes as my open elective.
Also, any suggestions on what text/ lectures to follow in order to understand the stuff better.
Right now, I am following Nielsen and Chuang, and doing well with it.

Thank you in advance!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
One professor told me the best path with grad school is go directly to the journals and keep researching until you find a someone or a team who's work is what you want to do, approach them directly, and then let the rest work itself out. With a path as new and undefined as Quantum Computing, it may be the way to go.
 
From what I know, it would also be a good idea to search for research papers in the theoretical computer science and cryptography as both fields involve the quantum computation.
 
Fooality said:
With a path as new and undefined as Quantum Computing, it may be the way to go.

The problem here is that whereas experimental QC is a new(ish) field the math/algorithms field has been around for quite a while; at least since the mid-80s (Shor's algorithm was published in 1994). Hence, it is a small but quite well researched field. This means that people already working in the field would know what kind of background is needed: typically a background in physics or math (or math-heavy CS),
Hence, having an ME background will be definite disadvantage and self-study on its own won't help: you need to pass exams in order to show that you actually know the material.
I am not sure there is a good solution to this. At the end of the day you need to study the topics relevant to what you actually want to do later on; which in the real world is sometimes easier said than done.

Also, did I mention that this is a small field? I would never recommend anyone who is at the undergraduate level to make life-changing choices based on some idea that they want is career in a field where the total number of permanent positions in the whole world is probably lower than 100 (even if you go to a large QC conference you will only find a small number of people who actually works on algorithms).
If you are interested in physics then study physics (maybe with a "high-level specialization such as condensed matter,. astrophysics or whatever) and keep an open mind for when it comes to what precise field you want to work in because that is always going to be largely out of your control.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Truecrimson

Similar threads

  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
5K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K