Is PV^gamma Constant in Adiabatic Processes?

  • Thread starter Thread starter stratz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Constant
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship PV^gamma in the context of adiabatic processes, specifically addressing the conditions under which this relationship holds true during adiabatic expansion where heat transfer (Q) is zero.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the derivation of the equation PV^gamma = constant, discussing the implications of work done by or on the gas, and the relationship between temperature and volume during adiabatic expansion. Questions arise regarding the signs in the equations and the validity of certain steps in the derivation.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on the interpretation of work in the context of the first law of thermodynamics, while others have suggested alternative approaches to the integration process. There appears to be ongoing exploration of different interpretations and methods without a clear consensus on the final form of the equation.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of understanding the signs associated with work and the implications of temperature changes during adiabatic processes. There is also mention of using identities related to specific heat capacities in the derivation.

stratz
Messages
23
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Proving PV^gamma = constant In adiabatic expansion. Q = 0

Homework Equations


N/A

The Attempt at a Solution



ΔEint = W

nCvdT = PdV = nRT / V dV

∫Cv/T dT = ∫R/V dV

Cv ln(T2/T1) = R ln(V2/V1)

ln(T2/T1) = (R/Cv) ln(V2/V1)

T2/T1 = (V2/V1)R⋅gamma / Cp

P2V2 / P1V1 = (V2/V1)R⋅gamma / Cp

I did some extra rearranging after this point, but it appears that the equation in this form cannot get PV^gamma = constant or for P1V1^gamma = P2V2^gamma. Is there a mistake somewhere?

Thanks.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
stratz said:
ΔEint = W

nCvdT = PdV = nRT / V dV
Watch the signs. Does W stand for the work done by the gas or the work done on the gas?
 
TSny said:
Watch the signs. Does W stand for the work done by the gas or the work done on the gas?
Well it is the differentiated form of work, but I guess that doesn't matter since the rate of change of work done on the gas is negative right?

I'll try adding a negative sign to that and see if it works. Thanks
 
To see if dT and dV have the same sign, think about what happens to the temperature during an adiabatic expansion.
 
Okay, so temperature will decrease as energy is lost in the form of work on the environment due to expansion of volume right?
 
stratz said:
Okay, so temperature will decrease as energy is lost in the form of work on the environment due to expansion of volume right?
Yes.

Some people write the first law for an infinitesimal reversible step as dE = dQ - dWby where dWby is the work done by the gas: dWby = +PdV.

Others write it as dE = dQ + dWon where dWon is the work done on the gas: dWon = - PdV

Either way, dE = dQ - PdV.
 
Alright, I got this to work correctly, I had to use the Cv + R identity which canceled out the Cp in the denominator. However this gave me P1V1^gamma = P2V2^gamma. Would it be possible to rearrange this somehow to make just one side equal to a constant?
 
State 2 can be thought of as any state during the adiabatic process. So for any state (P, V) during the process, you have P V γ = P1V1γ.
 
TSny said:
State 2 can be thought of as any state during the adiabatic process. So for any state (P, V) during the process, you have P V γ = P1V1γ.

Yeah, it's just that I saw a proof somewhere where they got PVgamma = econstant which ended up being PVgamma = constant. Anyways, it's pretty much the same result.

Thanks for the help
 
  • #10
Instead of doing definite integrals from state 1 to state 2, you could do indefinite integrals. This will lead to P V γ = const where the const is related to the constants of integration of the indefinite integrals.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: stratz

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
12K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
7K