Is PV^gamma Constant in Adiabatic Processes?

  • Thread starter Thread starter stratz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Constant
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
9 replies · 6K views
stratz
Messages
23
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Proving PV^gamma = constant In adiabatic expansion. Q = 0

Homework Equations


N/A

The Attempt at a Solution



ΔEint = W

nCvdT = PdV = nRT / V dV

∫Cv/T dT = ∫R/V dV

Cv ln(T2/T1) = R ln(V2/V1)

ln(T2/T1) = (R/Cv) ln(V2/V1)

T2/T1 = (V2/V1)R⋅gamma / Cp

P2V2 / P1V1 = (V2/V1)R⋅gamma / Cp

I did some extra rearranging after this point, but it appears that the equation in this form cannot get PV^gamma = constant or for P1V1^gamma = P2V2^gamma. Is there a mistake somewhere?

Thanks.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
TSny said:
Watch the signs. Does W stand for the work done by the gas or the work done on the gas?
Well it is the differentiated form of work, but I guess that doesn't matter since the rate of change of work done on the gas is negative right?

I'll try adding a negative sign to that and see if it works. Thanks
 
Okay, so temperature will decrease as energy is lost in the form of work on the environment due to expansion of volume right?
 
stratz said:
Okay, so temperature will decrease as energy is lost in the form of work on the environment due to expansion of volume right?
Yes.

Some people write the first law for an infinitesimal reversible step as dE = dQ - dWby where dWby is the work done by the gas: dWby = +PdV.

Others write it as dE = dQ + dWon where dWon is the work done on the gas: dWon = - PdV

Either way, dE = dQ - PdV.
 
Alright, I got this to work correctly, I had to use the Cv + R identity which canceled out the Cp in the denominator. However this gave me P1V1^gamma = P2V2^gamma. Would it be possible to rearrange this somehow to make just one side equal to a constant?
 
TSny said:
State 2 can be thought of as any state during the adiabatic process. So for any state (P, V) during the process, you have P V γ = P1V1γ.

Yeah, it's just that I saw a proof somewhere where they got PVgamma = econstant which ended up being PVgamma = constant. Anyways, it's pretty much the same result.

Thanks for the help
 
Instead of doing definite integrals from state 1 to state 2, you could do indefinite integrals. This will lead to P V γ = const where the const is related to the constants of integration of the indefinite integrals.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: stratz