Is R^n Euclidean Space a vector space too?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on whether the Euclidean space R^n qualifies as a vector space and the relationship between matrices of dimensions 1x2 or 2x1 and R^n. The scope includes theoretical considerations of vector spaces and their properties.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Technical explanation, Conceptual clarification, Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions if R^n is an example of a vector space.
  • Another participant asserts that R^n is indeed a vector space but expresses confusion regarding the second question about matrices.
  • A clarification is provided regarding the nature of 1x2 and 2x1 matrices, suggesting that they can be related to R^2.
  • One participant states that there is a linear isomorphism between 1x2 matrices and R^2.
  • Another participant distinguishes between the geometric nature of R^n and the algebraic structure of vector spaces, emphasizing the need for defined operations like addition and scalar multiplication.
  • This participant proposes that if these operations are considered natural, then R^n can correspond to an n-dimensional vector space.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the nature of R^n as a vector space, with some agreeing on its status while others highlight the need for defined operations, indicating an unresolved debate on the topic.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations in the discussion regarding the definitions of vector spaces and the operations required for R^n to be classified as such. The relationship between matrices and R^n is also not fully resolved.

bacte2013
Messages
394
Reaction score
57
Dear Physics Forum personnel,

I am curious if the euclidean space R^n is an example of vector space. Also can matrices with 1x2 or 2x1 dimension be a vector for the R^n?

PK
 
Physics news on Phys.org
bacte2013 said:
I am curious if the euclidean space R^n is an example of vector space.

Yes.

Also can matrices with 1x2 or 2x1 dimension be a vector for the R^n?

No clue what you mean.
 
micromass said:
Yes.
No clue what you mean.
As for the second question, I mean if the 1x2 matrix (a1, a2) or its 2x1 form (column vector) can be considered as a vector for the R^2 since the R^2 is basically the collection of real numbers in the ordered pair (a, b)?
 
There is a linear isomorphism between the ##1\times 2##-matrices and ##\mathbb{R}^2##, yes.
 
The Eulclidean space Rn is geometric- there are such things as points and distances defined but no "operations". A vector space is algebraic we must have operations such as sum and scalar multiplication defined. Of course, for, finite dimensional Rn, we can define the sum as (x1, x2,... , xn)+ (y1, y2, ..., yn)= (x1+ y1, x2+ y2... , xn+ yn) and scalar multiplication defined as a(x1, x2, ..., xn)= (ax1, ax2, ..., axn). If we consider those operations as "natural" then we can think of this as a "natural" correspondence between Rn and an n dimensional vector space.[/sub][/sub]
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K