Undergrad Is Euclidean Space Inherently Geometric or Just a Vector Space?

Click For Summary
The discussion explores the relationship between Euclidean space as a vector space and its geometric properties. It emphasizes that geometry requires a measure, typically an inner product, to define angles and distances, rather than relying on a geometric grid. The conversation also distinguishes between local geometric properties, such as curvature and angles, and global topological properties, highlighting that geometry is fundamentally about measurements while topology concerns the intrinsic nature of spaces. Additionally, it addresses the concept of groups operating on sets, noting that groups can exist independently of the sets they act upon. Ultimately, the discourse underscores the necessity of a metric for establishing geometric structures within vector spaces.
  • #31
martinbn said:
What if it s given a connection, wouldn't that count as geometry?

martinbn said:
What if it s given a connection, wouldn't that count as geometry?

Yes - in a more general sense.

- One could have a connection that is compatible with a metric but is not a Levi_Civita connection

- One could have a connection on the tangent bundle that is not compatible with any metric. In this case I do not see how distance relations can be derived - but not sure. Still one has curvature and parallel translation,

This thread though seems to assume metric relations of some kind.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
475
Replies
27
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
796
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K