News Is Romney's War Threat Against Iran Just a Political Move?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Nano-Passion
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Romney's potential threats of military action against Iran if it does not abandon its nuclear program have sparked significant debate. Many participants express concern that a war with Iran would be vastly different from previous conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan, highlighting Iran's military capabilities and the risk of retaliation against U.S. civilians. The discussion also points out that both major political parties in the U.S. appear to be leaning toward military options, with Obama acknowledging that military action has not been ruled out. Critics argue that Romney's rhetoric mirrors past administrations' tactics, suggesting that it is more about garnering votes than presenting a viable foreign policy. The conversation touches on the geopolitical implications of a potential conflict, including the involvement of countries like China and Russia, which could complicate matters further. Participants emphasize the need for diplomacy and caution against the rush to war, reflecting a broader anxiety about escalating tensions in the Middle East and the potential for another protracted conflict.
  • #51
Can we put all pretensions aside for a second?

Romney and Obama both support the exact same policies on Iran (tough sanctions). There is no larger fundamental difference.

Except Romney is appealing to a crowd that hates Iran.
Obama is appealing to an anti-war crowd.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #52
jduster said:
Can we put all pretensions aside for a second?

Romney and Obama both support the exact same policies on Iran (tough sanctions). There is no larger fundamental difference.

Except Romney is appealing to a crowd that hates Iran.
Obama is appealing to an anti-war crowd.

What sanctions have we placed on Iran by the way?
 
  • #53
jduster said:
Can we put all pretensions aside for a second?

Romney and Obama both support the exact same policies on Iran (tough sanctions). There is no larger fundamental difference.

Except Romney is appealing to a crowd that hates Iran.
Obama is appealing to an anti-war crowd.
If you actually attempt to cite statements from the two on Iran in any kind of thorough way I think you'll find you are grossly mistaken about 'exact same' policies.
 

Similar threads

News Biden: New Israel would be 'ill-advised' to attack Iran
3
Replies
132
Views
14K
News Is the US Preparing for War with Iran?
2
Replies
58
Views
9K
News Is Iran Developing Nuclear Weapons and What Actions Will the US Take?
Replies
10
Views
5K
News Should the US intervene in world problems?
Replies
29
Views
10K
News Iran's nukes: posturing and playground politics.
Replies
41
Views
7K
News Is War Sometimes Necessary to Achieve Peace?
Replies
9
Views
4K
News Weapons of Mass Destruction & Proliferation
Replies
24
Views
4K
News Rumsfeld's war against the military
Replies
32
Views
5K
News Third Option For Dealing With Iran
Replies
35
Views
5K
News Renaissance and reaction to Islam.
Replies
49
Views
7K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top