Is root over a^2=modolus of a?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Ahmed Abdullah
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Root
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
14 replies · 4K views
Ahmed Abdullah
Messages
203
Reaction score
3
Is "root over a^2=modolus of a?"

mod of a is always positive, but root over a^2 can both be positive or negative. So how these two can be equal to each other?
I have found this in a math textbook. But I can't convince myself about it.

It will be very helpful if you give a proof.

Thnx in anticipation.
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
There are two square roots of any number, agreed, but the symbol x^{1/2} is explicitly chosen to be one of them, and for positive real numbers, the positive one is always chosen.
 
so root over (-5)^2=5
RIGHT?
 
matt grime said:
There are two square roots of any number, agreed, but the symbol x^{1/2} is explicitly chosen to be one of them, and for positive real numbers, the positive one is always chosen.

Q:When x^{1/2} is a negative real number?
A: Never!
So the negative square root of x is expressed by the symbol -x^{1/2}.
Am I right?
 
Ahmed Abdullah said:
Q:When x^{1/2} is a negative real number?
A: Never!
So the negative square root of x is expressed by the symbol -x^{1/2}.
Am I right?

Yes that's correct. This way [tex]\sqrt{.}[/tex] is a function (single valued) and we can always refer to the positive root of [tex]x^2=1[/tex] as [tex]\sqrt{x}[/tex], or the negative root, [tex]-\sqrt{x}[/tex], or both roots, [tex]\pm \, \sqrt{x}[/tex] as we wish.
 
Last edited:
This is a dilemma (I think I spelt it wrong...) I had when calculating ranges of certain functions. Because of the way computer have worked since the 70's functions have been defined (especially the SQRT function), to take only one value - the positive value...
 
prasannapakkiam said:
T Because of the way computer have worked since the 70's functions have been defined (especially the SQRT function), to take only one value - the positive value...


Really? You think that functions are defined to be single valued owing to theinvention of computers in the 70s?
 
yes, and I have got a few people that agree strongly with this...
 
I doubt we can pin down the first time someone wrote down the formal definition of a function, but it was many decades before the 1970s. One need only look at the notion of branch cuts and Riemann surfaces (c. 1900) to notice that.
 
:smile:
uart said:
Yes that's correct. This way [tex]\sqrt{.}[/tex] is a function (single valued) and we can always refer to the positive root of [tex]x^2=1[/tex] as [tex]\sqrt{x}[/tex], or the negative root, [tex]-\sqrt{x}[/tex], or both roots, [tex]\pm \, \sqrt{x}[/tex] as we wish.

It is great to get rid of every piece of misconceptions.
I am a happy man now. :approve:[tex]^2=1[/tex]
 
Last edited:
prasannapakkiam said:
yes, and I have got a few people that agree strongly with this...

Next thing you know, arcsin(x) will only return a value between 0 and 2Pi!
 
Well yes. This is one thing that really irritates me.
 
Office_Shredder said:
Next thing you know, arcsin(x) will only return a value between 0 and 2Pi!
You mean -pi/2 and pi/2. :wink:
 
Ahmed Abdullah said:
:smile:It is great to get rid of every piece of misconceptions.
I am a happy man now. :approve:[tex]^2=1[/tex]

Yes that was a typo :blushing:, I meant to say :
... we can always refer to the positive root of [tex]x^2=a[/tex] as [tex]\sqrt{a}[/tex] ...
 
Last edited: