Is Ruby Still Relevant in the World of Programming?

  • Thread starter Thread starter G037H3
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ruby
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the relevance of the Ruby programming language in the current programming landscape, including comparisons with Python and personal experiences with both languages. Participants share their preferences, experiences, and challenges with Ruby and its frameworks.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested, Personal experience sharing, Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express a fondness for Ruby, highlighting its syntax and flexibility, while others indicate a shift in focus towards Python.
  • One participant notes a preference for Ruby's "There's More Than One Way To Do It" (TMTOWTDI) philosophy, suggesting a more creative approach to programming.
  • Another participant mentions that while they learned Ruby first, they now primarily use Python due to its more mature implementation and features like generators.
  • Concerns are raised about Ruby's performance, with one participant stating that Ruby is "far too slow" for their liking and expressing a dislike for duck-typed programming.
  • Participants discuss the lack of advanced debugging tools for Ruby compared to Python, specifically mentioning the absence of a visual debugger like WinPDB for Ruby.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally express mixed feelings about Ruby's relevance, with some appreciating its syntax and flexibility while others prefer Python for its maturity and performance. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the overall relevance of Ruby in comparison to other languages.

Contextual Notes

Participants' views are influenced by personal experiences and preferences, and there are unresolved comparisons regarding performance, tooling, and language features.

Who May Find This Useful

Individuals interested in programming languages, particularly those considering Ruby or Python, as well as developers reflecting on language relevance and personal preferences in coding.

G037H3
Messages
280
Reaction score
2
Any other Ruby developers? :)

Pure Ruby or RoR, I don't care. Anyone else love this language? :D
 
Technology news on Phys.org


I finally get around to learning Python and you go and swap focus. Not impressed.
 


JaredJames said:
I finally get around to learning Python and you go and swap focus. Not impressed.

Haha! It's too inflexible for me. I really prefer TMTOWTDI. I'm too right-brained I guess :wink:
 


G037H3 said:
Pure Ruby or RoR, I don't care. Anyone else love this language? :D
I do! I actually learned to program in it before learning Python...

Having said that, I actually do more Python programming than Ruby although I still do a fair bit of Ruby programming. The problem is that while I prefer the Ruby syntax, Python still has a more mature implementation. For example, Python 3.0 has done away with lists as default containers and have moved onto generators. After all, you rarely actually need the list and, in the rare times that you do, you can make one out of your generator! Ruby is still using lists, for now...

Also, and this is the real kicker for me, there exists a good visual debugger for Python called WinPDB. Sadly, there's nothing like it for Ruby...
 


It was amongst the first programming languages I've learned. I still use it for occasional tinkering but it's far too slow for me to love, that and I very much dislike duck-typed programming.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
27
Views
31K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
86
Views
3K
Replies
38
Views
4K
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K