Is ρV a reliable measure of atom probability in small volumes?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter aaaa202
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Density Probability
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the reliability of using the product of density (ρ) and volume (V) as a measure of atom probability in very small volumes. Participants explore the implications of averaging in density and the challenges of applying statistical mechanics and quantum mechanics to small-scale systems.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes that density is an averaged quantity, which may not be applicable in very small volumes where fluctuations are significant.
  • Another participant argues that in thermodynamics, small volumes are still relatively large compared to atomic scales, suggesting that averages may still hold.
  • A different participant questions the validity of defining probability in volumes smaller than typical scales, seeking clarification on how to translate density into probability.
  • One contributor suggests using statistical mechanics to approach the problem, emphasizing that the assumption of equal probability for microstates in equilibrium is fundamental but not universally applicable.
  • Another participant mentions the relevance of statistical mechanics of solids and various statistical distributions (Fermi-Dirac, Boltzmann) that may apply, while expressing uncertainty about which would be most suitable for the specific example discussed.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the applicability of density as a measure of atom probability in small volumes. There is no consensus on whether ρV can reliably indicate probability in such contexts, and the discussion remains unresolved regarding the best approach to the problem.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations in applying statistical mechanics and quantum mechanics to small volumes, noting the challenges posed by averaging and the assumptions inherent in statistical models.

aaaa202
Messages
1,144
Reaction score
2
Suppose you have a metal with some given density ρ. Now we all know that density is a kind averaged quantity, which only makes sense for large enough volumes to contain fluctuations across the microscopic world.
Now in an exercise, I am asked what is the probability to find an atom in a very small volume V- so small that the product ρV is very small. Is ρV then a measure of the probability of finding an atom in the volume V or is it complicated by the fact that density is an averaged quantity?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Usually when we look at small volumes in thermodynamics, we are still looking at "big" volumes in comparison to the size of atoms and molecules. So, even though the volume element is "small" in comparison to the total volume, it is big enough that averages still make sense, so that our "micro system" is still internally in equilibrium.
 
But in this context I am interested in a volume smaller than this. Does it make sense to talk of a probability?
For instance suppose my atom density is one mole per cubic centimeter. Is the probability to find one atom in 1cubic cm / 1 mole then 1 or how can it be translated into a probability?
 
Last edited:
You can use statistical mechanics to do this problem. You basically get a phase space, and a distribution on that phase space to obtain probabilities. However, you should note that the fundamental assumption of statistical mechanics is that all possibilities (microstates) in equilibrium are equally probable. This is just an assumption! (Which works remarkably well for almost all physical processes that we care about). If you want an answer that is NOT based off of this assumption, you might have to try to actually solve the multi-particle wavefunctions from quantum mechanics, but this is typically very (impossibly) difficult due to the extremely large number of particles involved.
 
Matterwave is correct in that your looking for statistical mechanics of solids, this is a lengthy subject that requires a good understanding of ideal gas laws. the Fermi-Dirac statistics are applicable to metals, you can possibly use Einstein solids or Boltzmann statistics.

I'm not positive which form will best apply in your example, but it should give you something to go on. However this dissertation may help

http://etd.library.vanderbilt.edu/available/etd-07302007-130108/unrestricted/01dissertationYing.pdf

still studying it myself, My interest in statistics are more geared to Cosmology applications. Hope this helps
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
6K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K