Is the 'A Level Physics by Roger Muncaster' suitable for 2018/2019 Syllabus?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Kevin J
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The book 'A Level Physics' by Roger Muncaster, originally published in the 1980s, is still considered suitable for the CIE A Level syllabus, despite concerns about its relevance to modern exams. While some users express that the book contains excessive information not directly applicable to the tests, others emphasize the importance of the author's teaching style in enhancing understanding. Ultimately, the decision to use this book depends on personal learning preferences and the balance between in-depth knowledge and test-focused study.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the CIE A Level Physics syllabus
  • Familiarity with educational resources for A Level studies
  • Ability to discern relevant study materials for exam preparation
  • Knowledge of different learning styles and their impact on education
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the latest CIE A Level Physics syllabus updates
  • Explore alternative A Level Physics textbooks and their reviews
  • Investigate study techniques that balance in-depth learning with exam preparation
  • Review forums discussing student experiences with various A Level Physics resources
USEFUL FOR

Students preparing for CIE A Level Physics, educators seeking effective teaching materials, and anyone interested in evaluating educational resources for depth versus exam relevance.

Kevin J
Messages
57
Reaction score
2
I know that this book was first written back then, in fact the 1/2nd edition was published in the 80s, is this book still 'suitable' for today's/modern A level exams? I like studying physics that are more 'in-depth', but I don't want studying unnecessary 'information'(because some people said this book offers too much resources that don't even appear on the test.) So is this book still 'Suitable' by today's standard & syllabus?(I'm taking CIE A LEVEL)
images%20(9).jpeg
 

Attachments

  • images%20(9).jpeg
    images%20(9).jpeg
    23.4 KB · Views: 620
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Kevin J said:
I like studying physics that are more 'in-depth', but I don't want studying unnecessary 'information'(because some people said this book offers too much resources that don't even appear on the test.)

If you like the author's style, then you will probably learn better from it than you would from a book that you don't particularly like. But be aware that any time you're trying to learn something you will necessarily learn stuff that you won't see on a test. There's more to learning than can be measured by a test, so you just have decide which is more important. I think both things are important, but as to which is more important, well, that's a personal choice.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Dale
Mister T said:
If you like the author's style, then you will probably learn better from it than you would from a book that you don't particularly like. But be aware that any time you're trying to learn something you will necessarily learn stuff that you won't see on a test. There's more to learning than can be measured by a test, so you just have decide which is more important. I think both things are important, but as to which is more important, well, that's a personal choice.
Well I haven't seen the book yet, so I can't tell :(
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 102 ·
4
Replies
102
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K