Actually, it turns out that it does! I didn't know this before today.
Since you mentioned the inflexion point, I'm guessing you know calculus. So the proof goes a little something like this:
[tex]f(x)=ax^3+bx^2+cx+d[/tex]
[tex]f'(x)=3ax^2+2bx+c[/tex]
[tex]f''(x)=6ax+2b[/tex]
Now obviously to find where the inflexion point is, we let the second derivative equal to 0, so we get
[tex]6ax+2b=0[/tex]
[tex]x=\frac{-b}{3a}[/tex]
Now, the most important point in this proof is the part that comes next. We know that functions are odd or even based on some simple properties [itex]f(-x)=-f(x)[/itex] and [itex]f(x)=f(-x)[/itex] respectively, but this only applies to functions that are odd or even about the y-axis.
What we're trying to prove is if all cubics are odd about their inflexion point (most of the time their inflexion point is not on the y-axis, so whenever [itex]b\neq 0[/itex]).
Before we try to figure out what we're supposed to be evaluating, let's take a simpler example:
[tex]g(x)=x^2-2x+1=(x-1)^2[/tex]
How can we prove that g(x) is an even function about its turning point? Well, if we evaluated g(x+1), we will get [itex]g(x+1)=x^2[/itex] which is an even function as we know, but how do we show that?
That is, we can't just slap the even property of f(x)=f(-x) onto g, because then we'd be trying to solve g(x+1)=g(-(x+1)) and g(-x-1) is not equal to g(x+1). So what is? Well, if it turns out that we need to solve g(x+1)=g(-x+1).
You should try figure out why this is for yourself.
Ok, so applying what we've discovered to the cubic, it turns out that we want to see if
[tex]f\left(x-\frac{b}{3a}\right)=-f\left(-x-\frac{b}{3a}\right)[/tex]
which if true, satisfies the proof that all cubics are symmetric about their inflexion point.