Is the Dirac Delta Function Squared Equal to Itself?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the properties of the Dirac delta function, particularly the expression of its square, denoted as $$\delta^2$$. It is established that $$\int \delta(x)^2 dx = \infty$$, indicating that the square of the Dirac delta function does not exist in the traditional sense. However, when viewed as a functional, $$\delta^2[f]$$ can be interpreted as $$\delta[f(0)]$$, leading to the conclusion that $$\delta^2 = c\delta$$ for some constant $$c$$, with varying opinions on the value of $$c$$. The discussion also highlights the distinction between the product and composition of Dirac delta functions and references Schwartz distributions and Colombeu algebra as frameworks for understanding these concepts.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Dirac delta function properties
  • Familiarity with Schwartz distributions
  • Knowledge of functional analysis
  • Basic principles of Colombeu algebra
NEXT STEPS
  • Study Schwartz distributions in detail
  • Explore the properties of Colombeu algebra
  • Research the implications of non-linear functionals
  • Investigate the physical interpretations of constants in distribution theory
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and students studying advanced calculus, functional analysis, or theoretical physics, particularly those interested in generalized functions and distribution theory.

jk22
Messages
732
Reaction score
25
I consider the Dirac delta.

In physics the delta squared has an infinite norm : $$\int\delta (x)^2=\infty $$

But if i look at delta being a functional i could write : $$\delta [f]=f (0) $$ hence $$\delta^2 [f]=\delta [\delta [f]]=\delta [\underbrace {f (0)}_{constant function}]=f (0)$$

Thus in this view $$\delta^2=\delta $$ ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Dirac delta is defined by the integral
##\int \delta(c) g(x) dx = g(c)##
If you plug in ##g(x) = \delta(x)## then you get
##\int \delta(c) \delta(x) dx = \delta(c)## which isn't finite. The integral fails.

You can think of the integral as a functional, but it doesn't make sense to think of delta as a functional.
 
Khashishi said:
You can think of the integral as a functional, but it doesn't make sense to think of delta as a functional.
Dirac delta is indeed a linear functional. Specifically it is the linear functional such that ##f \mapsto f(0)##. Schwartz distributions are our most developed theory of generalized functions, and there all Schwartz distributions are linear functionals.

Now to OP. If you want ##\delta^2 = \delta \cdot \delta## to exist as a Schwartz distribution as well, then it turns out that ##\delta^2 = c\delta## for some constant ##c##, but not for the reason you posted. The notation ##\delta^2## is reserved for the product of Dirac with itself, not the composition of Dirac with itself. As to what ##c## is, there's a lot of disagreement. If the product defined is a "normal product" then ##c=0##. Some mathematicians have argued that non-zero c has physical meaning. Some argue ##c = \infty##. Others define it to be ##c = \delta(0)## and not define what that means (as long as it cancels in the end they are happy with it). So yeah a lot of disagreement.

That being said, if you aren't working with Schwartz distributions, such as working in Colombeu algebra, then it is the operator ##f(x) \mapsto f(-x)^2## (technically the equivalence class of such operators), which in turn corresponds to the non-linear functional ##f \mapsto f(0)^2##

Edit: One last thing. There are people who write ##\delta^2## for ##\delta(x)\delta(y)##, i.e. the two dimensional Dirac delta. But then you wouldn't have ##\int \delta^2 = \infty## at the top of your post, so I'm ignoring that situation.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K