nottay
- 9
- 0
Is an electron the smallest stable subatomic particle? By stable I mean it can exist independently of other particles.
The discussion centers around the question of whether the electron is the smallest stable subatomic particle, with participants exploring definitions of "smallest" and "stable" in the context of particle physics. The scope includes conceptual clarifications and debates regarding the properties of various particles.
Participants express differing views on what constitutes the "smallest" and "stable" particle, with no consensus reached on the definitions or the answer to the original question.
The discussion highlights limitations in the definitions used, the ambiguity in the term "stable," and the unresolved nature of neutrino mass measurements.
The same could be said about any other particle, but I agree, the question isn't really precise enough to answer unambiguously.Naty1 said:Take your pick from here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_particles
The question is very vague for because for example the electron will immediately combine with a positively charged particle...is that "stable" enough for you?? does an electron in an atom meet your criteria?...in addition, the typical electron is a "cloud" rather than a point particle as often modeled.
phyzguy said:What do you mean by "smallest"? Lightest?
nottay said:By "smallest" I mean non-zero rest mass. By "stable" I mean it can exist independently of other subatomic particles for an extended period of time.[/QUOTE
The lightest stable elementary particle appears to be the electron neutrino. I say appears to be because the neutrino masses are not known very accurately, but my understanding is that the electron neutrino is the lightest of the three neutrinos.