Is the Empathy Quotient Test Accurate and Reliable?

  • Thread starter Thread starter physics user1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Funny Test
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion critiques the accuracy and reliability of the Empathy Quotient Test, as presented on Psychology Tools. Participants express skepticism about the test's scientific validity, with scores ranging from 10 to 34 out of 80. Concerns are raised regarding the test's wording, particularly the use of "emphasise" instead of "empathise," and the redundancy of similar questions. Overall, the consensus indicates that the test may not effectively measure empathy due to its design flaws and the subjective nature of the questions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of psychological testing concepts
  • Familiarity with the Empathy Quotient Test framework
  • Knowledge of common psychological terminology
  • Basic comprehension of statistical reliability in assessments
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the validity and reliability of psychological assessments
  • Explore alternative empathy measurement tools, such as the Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI)
  • Study the impact of question phrasing on test outcomes
  • Investigate the role of social cues in empathy responses
USEFUL FOR

Psychologists, educators, researchers in psychology, and individuals interested in understanding empathy measurement and its implications in social behavior.

physics user1
https://psychology-tools.com/empathy-quotient/

Also watch this video:

How it was? What was your empathy quotient? Did you yawn? :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yeah, out of sheer boredom.
But the third pic in 'people yawning' was magnificent: what a disguise !
And I also think the composers may wel fail the idiot test they advertise at the end: "scientifical' . Ha !
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: gracy
I had 34 out of 80 what ever that means.
 
"Scientifical"...really?

Anyway, I didn't yawn; I guess I'm a certified psychopath. :)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: DaveC426913
I got 21:eek:
 
Cruz Martinez said:
I got 21:eek:
If it makes you feel better, I got 17. If I saw someone cry, I would feel awful and probably try to comfort them. I also always try to put myself in someone else's shoes. The problem is I suck at detecting social cues. I have a very dry sense of humor that often offends people. Because of that, I prefer to be alone.

I admit, I do prefer non-human animals to humans.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Cruz Martinez
Amrator said:
If it makes you feel better, I got 17. If I saw someone cry, I would feel awful and probably try to comfort them. I also always try to put myself in someone else's shoes. The problem is I suck at detecting social cues. I have a very dry sense of humor that often offends people. Because of that, I prefer to be alone.

I admit, I do prefer non-human animals to humans.
I am exactly like that. I think the name of the test is a bit midleading.
 
I may have a problem, I only yawned when I saw the dog yawn.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: DaveC426913
BvU said:
Yeah, out of sheer boredom.
But the third pic in 'people yawning' was magnificent: what a disguise !
And I also think the composers may wel fail the idiot test they advertise at the end: "scientifical' . Ha !
Also, "...lack the ability to emphasise and recognise the emotions of others". How does "emphasise" fit into that sentence? Shouldn't it be "empathise"? Or am I missing something.

I get infected by yawning in real life, but had absolutely no reaction to the ones in the video. My suspicion is that I see it as staged, so there's no social cue to respond to.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: BvU
  • #10
"You’'re in a desert walking along in the sand when all of the sudden you look down, and you see a tortoise, it’'s crawling toward you. You reach down, you flip the tortoise over on its back. The tortoise lays on its back, its belly baking in the hot sun, beating it's legs trying to turn itself over, but it can’'t, not without your help. But you'’re not helping. Why is that?"
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Amrator
  • #11
I got 10/80 on the empathy test
 
  • #12
According to the sources listed at the bottom either Borat or Ali G had a hand in that test. Which goes some way to explaining the erratic results.
 
  • #13
Many questions are so similar, I don't see how having all of them would improve the accuracy of the test. Some of them are strange.
I prefer animals to humans.
Even ignoring that humans are animals: Context? Do I prefer a street or a bottle of water? Well, depends on where I am, where I want to go and how thirsty I am.
I dream most nights.
Everyone does every night (or more precisely, when they sleep). What a strange question.
Before making a decision, I always weigh up the pros and cons.
No one does. We make tiny decisions all the time. Like, every second.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: QuantumQuest and Amrator
  • #14
mfb said:
Many questions are so similar, I don't see how having all of them would improve the accuracy of the test. Some of them are strange.

If you change some of your answers to some of the questions, the score doesn't change. So I guess some questions are not necessary for some reason? I don't really understand the entire scoring of the test.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Amrator

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
994
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
779
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
11K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
8K