Adriadne
- 23
- 0
Thanks for that, I was quite incorrectly equating {0} with { }.
The discussion centers on whether the empty set can be considered a valid vector space. Participants assert that while the empty set is a subset of every set, it cannot satisfy the requirements of a vector space due to the absence of a zero vector, which serves as the additive identity. The axioms of vector spaces, particularly those requiring the existence of specific elements, cannot be fulfilled by the empty set. Thus, the consensus is that the empty set does not qualify as a vector space.
PREREQUISITESMathematics students, educators in linear algebra, and anyone interested in the foundational concepts of vector spaces and set theory.
Adriadne said:Oh dear, I hope as a neophyte, I'm not making a fool of myself.
OK look. Grant me that, if the empty set is a trivial subset of V, then it must, by the definition, contain the identity. So, is there no sense, in the case that the set V is a vector space, that the zero vector can be identified with the identity?
You're welcome.Adriadne said:Thanks for that, I was quite incorrectly equating {0} with { }.
Ha! Be careful what you say, I have a zillion half-assed questions up my sleeve!phoenixthoth said:Have fun here at PF!