Is the energy required for fission equal to that for fusion?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter letsfailsafe
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    E=mc^2 Fission Fusion
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the comparison of energy requirements for nuclear fission and fusion processes, particularly questioning whether the energy needed for fission is equal to that required for fusion. Participants explore this topic in the context of nuclear physics, touching on theoretical aspects and practical implications.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions if the energy required to fission a hydrogen atom is equal to the energy required to fuse particles to create a hydrogen atom, suggesting a misunderstanding of the processes involved.
  • Another participant clarifies that E=mc² relates to the energy released from fission and fusion, not the energy required to initiate these processes.
  • It is noted that the energy from fission of Uranium is not the same as the energy from fusion of hydrogen isotopes, with fusion energy being approximately three to four times greater than fission energy.
  • A specific fusion process, such as deuterium and tritium fusing to form helium, is mentioned, indicating that the energy required for the corresponding fission process would be equal to the energy released in fusion.
  • One participant points out that most hydrogen atoms cannot be fissioned, as they consist of a single proton, and emphasizes that the difficulty of fusion is primarily an engineering challenge.
  • Another participant states that while the energy released in fusion and absorbed in fission may have the same magnitude, they are not equal in terms of their signs, indicating a directional aspect to the processes.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the comparison of energy requirements for fission and fusion, with no consensus reached on whether they can be considered equal. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the specifics of energy equivalence in these nuclear processes.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the complexity of comparing fission and fusion processes, noting that specific conditions and types of reactions must be considered. The discussion also reflects a lack of clarity regarding the definitions and assumptions underlying the comparison.

letsfailsafe
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
Hi, this is my second year studying physics and few weeks ago we went into nuclear physics very briefly because we are learning it next year.

I'm not sure if the energy required to fission is equal to the energy required to fusion. For example is energy required to fission hydrogen atom, equal to fusion particles together to create hydrogen atom? (If fissioning result particles were same with fusioning particles)

According to my friend who studies chemistry says it's not equal. (I do not study chemistry). Just according to E=mc2 if result of fission particles and particles required to fusion were the same, this means that mass and number of particles needed to fuse would be equal.

I know that fusion is much harder to do, and we can't just put particles together to form an atom... Please give me a understandable answer.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
"e= mc^2" has nothing to do with the energy required to cause fission or fusion. It is, rather, the energy you get out of fusion and fission. For example, Uranium 239 fissions into Neptunium 239 plus a neutron. The total mass of the the Neptunium 239 atom and the neutron is slightly less than the mass of a Uranium 239 atom. The difference in mass turns into energy, e= mc^2, and is sent off as a gamma ray.

When two heavy hydrogen atoms combine to form a helium atom, the helium atom has slightly less mass that the total of the two hydrogen atoms. The difference in mass turns into energy.

But the energy from one atom of Uranium fissioning is NOT the same as the energy from two hydrogen atoms fusioning. The fusion energy is about three to four times greater than the fission energy.
 
HallsofIvy said:
But the energy from one atom of Uranium fissioning is NOT the same as the energy from two hydrogen atoms fusioning. The fusion energy is about three to four times greater than the fission energy.

That's the energy per nucleon. The fission energy of 1 atom of Uranium is about 200 MeV, more than 10 times the energy of any fusion reaction with hydrogen isotopes.
 
It is not really clear which processes you want to compare.

A specific fusion process will always release/need exactly the energy the corresponding fission process will need/release.
You can fuse deuterium+tritium (both are hydrogen isotopes) to helium+neutron, for example, this releases 17.6 MeV of energy. If you try to fission that helium nucleus again, you have to add a neutron and those 17.6 MeV of energy to get deuterium+tritium.

Fusion of light elements (like hydrogen) gives more energy per mass than fission of heavy elements (like uranium), but that is comparing apples and oranges.

For example is energy required to fission hydrogen atom
Most hydrogen atoms are a single proton, you cannot fission them.
letsfailsafe said:
I know that fusion is much harder to do, and we can't just put particles together to form an atom...
That is "just" an engineering issue.
 
letsfailsafe said:
Hi, this is my second year studying physics and few weeks ago we went into nuclear physics very briefly because we are learning it next year.

I'm not sure if the energy required to fission is equal to the energy required to fusion. For example is energy required to fission hydrogen atom, equal to fusion particles together to create hydrogen atom? (If fissioning result particles were same with fusioning particles)

According to my friend who studies chemistry says it's not equal. (I do not study chemistry). Just according to E=mc2 if result of fission particles and particles required to fusion were the same, this means that mass and number of particles needed to fuse would be equal.

I know that fusion is much harder to do, and we can't just put particles together to form an atom... Please give me a understandable answer.

Two hydrogen atoms fusing to make a helium atom release X amount of energy. The helium atom splitting into two hydrogens absorbs that same amount of energy. The magnitude (absolute value) of the energy is the same but the sign is opposite. So they aren't equal.

The equilibrium favors helium so strongly that the reverse reaction virtually never happens and is always neglected.
 

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
9K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
10K
  • · Replies 49 ·
2
Replies
49
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K