Is the Estimated Value of Precious Metals on Asteroid Accurate?

  • Thread starter Thread starter aquitaine
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    News Report
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the estimated value of precious metals on an asteroid, specifically questioning the accuracy of a figure suggesting that one asteroid contains resources worth at least $20 trillion. Participants explore the implications of this estimate, the feasibility of mining such resources, and the broader context of precious metal availability both in space and on Earth.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express skepticism about the accuracy of the $20 trillion figure, questioning whether such a large amount of precious metals could realistically be present on one asteroid.
  • Others find the estimate reasonable, suggesting that the size of the asteroid could justify the high valuation.
  • One participant notes that while the asteroid may contain significant resources, the Earth itself has more, raising doubts about the practicality of mining asteroids.
  • Concerns are raised about the logistics of transporting materials from space back to Earth, with one participant highlighting the high costs associated with space travel.
  • Another participant mentions the existence of substantial gold reserves in Earth's oceans, suggesting that terrestrial resources may also be significant.
  • Participants discuss the potential impact of increased supply on the value of these metals, indicating that if asteroids were mined, the market value could decrease.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the accuracy of the estimated value of precious metals on the asteroid. Multiple competing views remain regarding the feasibility of mining asteroids and the implications for precious metal markets.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the figures discussed may depend on definitions of recoverable resources versus total amounts available, and there is uncertainty about the economic viability of space mining given current costs.

Astronomy news on Phys.org
Really? There's really that much in proven resources just sitting there on one asteroid? Whoa...
 
Well yeah but the Earth is a bigger rock. :PI'm kind of surprised no one has come up with a solid plan to go there, $20 trillion should be more than enough return to justify investing in space, hence my initial disbelief at the accuracy of that figure.
 
aquitaine said:
Well yeah but the Earth is a bigger rock. :P
Yes, and of course the Earth has much more!

[edit] Misread the quantity in the article...

Here's a link with a chart showing estimated reserves of a bunch of metals. They seem a little low based on what I've seen elsewhere, but it at least is a good order of magnitude and all in one place: http://www.24hgold.com/english/news...ewitt&article=1427726620G10020&redirect=False

It looks like there is more of the precious metals there, though less of the less precious such as aluminum.
[edit2] Note also, the Earth's reserves noted above are the relatively easily recoverable reserves, not the toal amount on earth. The calculation for Eros is the total amount.
I'm kind of surprised no one has come up with a solid plan to go there, $20 trillion should be more than enough return to justify investing in space, hence my initial disbelief at the accuracy of that figure.
The problem is getting the stuff back. Even if there were solid platinum rocks floating around in low Earth orbit, it wouldn't be cost effective to bring them back to earth.
 
Last edited:
Closer to home - there's 10-20 Million tons of gold in the Earth's oceans.
 
There are at least three problems:

(1) Where do you put this asteroid?

(2) Supply and demand - these metals wouldn't be so precious if there were an asteroid's worth of them on Earth.

(3) Space travel is expensive. It cost $170B in 2005 dollars for 380 kg of moon rocks. It will have to become many orders of magnitude cheaper before mining in space is cost-effective.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 96 ·
4
Replies
96
Views
12K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
625