Is the Floating Launch Loop a Viable Alternative for Space Exploration?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter darkdave3000
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Floating Launch Loop
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the viability of a floating launch loop concept for space exploration, proposed as an alternative to traditional rocket systems like SpaceX's Falcon 9. The floating launch loop, envisioned as a super balloon structure, aims to launch 20-ton payloads from high altitudes, potentially overcoming atmospheric limitations. However, concerns are raised regarding the payload capacity at 30 km altitude and the structural requirements that may hinder its effectiveness compared to existing technologies. The conversation highlights the need for further exploration of both the floating launch loop and the cost-effectiveness of established systems for future space missions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of rocket propulsion systems
  • Familiarity with atmospheric physics and altitude effects
  • Knowledge of payload capacity and structural engineering
  • Awareness of current space launch technologies, particularly SpaceX Falcon 9
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the engineering principles behind floating launch systems
  • Explore the capabilities and limitations of SpaceX Falcon 9 for heavy payload launches
  • Investigate the design and functionality of space elevators
  • Examine the potential of nuclear thermal rockets for future space missions
USEFUL FOR

Aerospace engineers, space exploration enthusiasts, and researchers interested in innovative launch systems and their comparative effectiveness against traditional rocket technologies.

darkdave3000
Messages
242
Reaction score
5
im writing a 2d space simulator and in it i want to simulate rockets as well as things like space elevators and spaceguns to allow players to compare how each system works and compare pros and cons. one idea i want to include in that simulator is my own that i want to promote to the new president and NASA eventually and its a floating launch loop where a super balloon structure many kms in size will act as a launch loop for 20 ton payloads above the thickest portions of the atmosphere. do you think this idea is worth exploring as an alternative to my first idea of a floating spacegun? www.roboticsolutions.tech/phase2

which is part of my 4 phased revive proposal
www.roboticsolutions.tech/revive

or do you think spacxex falcon9 should be cost effective enough for america to do great things such as launch nuclear thermal rockets and payloads into geosynchronous orbit for a affordable space elevator 750tons?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
20 g over many seconds is certainly not for humans. 3.5 km/s is also not enough to get you anywhere, you still need a massive rocket. More massive than this system can launch.
Shooting vertically you are quite limited in orbits you can reach easily.

The payload of these airships will be tiny at 30 km altitude. To hold up the structure they have to be even higher, reducing the payload even more.
 

Similar threads

Alternative spacelaunch methods
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • Sticky
Kerbal Space Program Tutorial Series - Open Access to 1.7
  • · Replies 48 ·
2
Replies
48
Views
69K
Kerbal Space Program - Rocket Design Basics
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
10K