Is the given Pauli matrix in SU(2)?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The given Pauli matrix, represented as [[0, -i], [i, 0]], is not an element of SU(2). While the matrix appears to fit the general form of SU(2) matrices, it fails to meet the criteria of being unitary. Pauli matrices serve as the traceless and Hermitian generators of infinitesimal SU(2) transformations, and any arbitrary SU(2) matrix can be derived through the exponentiation of a linear combination of these matrices.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of SU(2) group properties
  • Familiarity with Pauli matrices
  • Knowledge of unitary matrices
  • Basic concepts of Hermitian operators
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of SU(2) matrices in detail
  • Learn about the role of Pauli matrices in quantum mechanics
  • Explore the concept of matrix exponentiation in quantum transformations
  • Investigate the relationship between Hermitian operators and unitary transformations
USEFUL FOR

Quantum physicists, mathematicians studying group theory, and anyone interested in the mathematical foundations of quantum mechanics will benefit from this discussion.

vertices
Messages
62
Reaction score
0
Can I check with someone - is the following pauli matrix in SU(2):

0 -i
i 0

Matrices in SU(2) take this form, I think:

a b
-b* a*

(where * represents complex conjugation)

It seems to me that the matrix at the top isn't in SU(2) - if b=-i, (-b*) should be -i...

However, my notes say otherwise (that all pauli matrices are in SU(2)).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Pauli matrices are not actually unitary matrices and thus are not actually themselves elements of SU(2). They are the traceless and Hermitian 'generators' of infinitesimal SU(2) transformations. I.e., an arbitrary SU(2) matrix is given by exponentiation of a linear combination of Pauli matrices.

This is if my memory serves me correctly. I'm sure someone will correct me if not.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K