Why choose traceless matrices as basis?

  • #1
phoenix95
Gold Member
77
22
While writing down the basis for SU(2), physicists often choose traceless hermitian matrices as such, often the Pauli matrices. Why is this? In particular why traceless, and why hermitian?
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
fresh_42
Mentor
Insights Author
2021 Award
16,692
16,032
Skew-Hermitian is a consequence of unitary, traceless of determinant one:
$$
U^\dagger U = I \Longrightarrow D(U^\dagger U) = U^\dagger \cdot I + I \cdot U = U^\dagger + U = D(I) = 0\\
\det U = 1 \Longrightarrow D(\det U) = \operatorname{tr}U = D(1) = 0
$$
Here's the computation for the determinant in detail:
https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/pantheon-derivatives-part-iv/
and here are some remarks on ##\operatorname{SU}(2)##:
https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/representations-precision-important/
https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/journey-manifold-su2-part-ii/
 

Related Threads on Why choose traceless matrices as basis?

  • Last Post
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
798
  • Last Post
Replies
16
Views
18K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Top