Is the gravitational time dilatation a real effect?

[nismaratwork]

Try keeping it professional, ok? No point in getting personal.

I remember that other thread you and kev fought for a few hundred posts. I think there is clearly something here. Maybe you two could PM a bit and come to an understanding? From the outside looking in, I'm just here, and I assume you two have a longstanding grudge.

 

[Al68]

Try keeping it professional, ok? No point in getting personal.

I don't have anything against kev, I don't like his hacky methods that involve putting in results by hand followed by shaky proofs.

Then why not just say that you disapprove of his method and why, show your own if you like, and move on instead of hijacking threads for hundreds of posts?

That would preserve the usefulness of the thread to others.

 

[starthaus]

Then why not just say that you disapprove of his method and why, show your own if you like,

This is precisely what I did.

 

[Al68]

Then why not just say that you disapprove of his method and why, show your own if you like,

This is precisely what I did.

LOL. The key word in my post is just.

 

[starthaus]

LOL. The key word in my post is just.

If you trolled less and you read more , you'd be so much better off.

 

[nismaratwork]

It would be trolling if it were not completely accurate, and a sentiment echoed by others.

 

[Passionflower]

What I wanted to say is that universe might end before you receive last signal no matter how long finite time of existence universe has ahead of itself. Maybe not if universe final fate is big crunch.

In principle one can only have a fully developed event horizon if spacetime is not closed.