Is the Graviton Too Elusive for Particle Physicists to Find at the LHC?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter joeyb9
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Graviton
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the challenges and interest in discovering the graviton, particularly in the context of particle physics and experiments at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC). Participants explore theoretical, experimental, and conceptual aspects of graviton detection, including its implications for bridging General Relativity and Quantum Mechanics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that the lack of interest in discovering the graviton may stem from its association with General Relativity and the current tenuous state of theories unifying it with Quantum Mechanics.
  • One participant argues that detecting gravitons is infeasible due to their high probability of passing through matter, likening it to the challenge of detecting neutrinos but noting it is significantly more difficult.
  • A participant provides a rough formulation of the graviton Lagrangian, discussing how rescaling variables leads to very low process rates at LHC energies, suggesting that evidence for individual gravitons would be extremely difficult to obtain.
  • Another viewpoint indicates that while the "normal" graviton may be undetectable at the LHC, certain models, particularly those involving extra dimensions, predict the existence of massive graviton-like particles that could potentially be observed.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the feasibility of detecting gravitons and the reasons behind the perceived lack of interest in their discovery. There is no consensus on the primary factors influencing this situation, and multiple competing perspectives are presented.

Contextual Notes

Participants note limitations in current theories and models, as well as the dependence on specific assumptions regarding graviton properties and detection methods. The discussion reflects ongoing uncertainties in the field.

joeyb9
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Why is there seemingly so little interest among particle physicists about discovering the graviton? Is it because it is believed to be too difficult, even hopeless, to find, or some other reason?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think its because the graviton comes from the General Relativity world and theories trying to bridge between Quantum Mechanics and General Relativity are still too tenuous that it isn't seriously looked for.

Also, once gravity waves are found then they will dig deeper.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graviton

but I'm sure if they ever do find a spin-2 massless particle there will be a lot of excitement in the Physics world...
 
joeyb9 said:
Why is there seemingly so little interest among particle physicists about discovering the graviton? Is it because it is believed to be too difficult, even hopeless, to find, or some other reason?

Detecting gravitons experimentally is hopelessly infeasible, because they pass through everything with very high probability. This is similar to the problem of detecting neutrinos, but many many orders of magnitude worse. See e.g. http://arxiv.org/pdf/gr-qc/0601043v3.pdf
 
The graviton Lagrangian is very roughly
[tex]L = \frac{1}{2G_N} |\nabla h|^2 - h \cdot T[/tex]
for Newtonian gravitational constant GN, metric perturbation h, and energy-momentum tensor T. Going over to quantum-mechanical units,
[tex]G_N = \frac{1}{m_{Pl}{}^2}[/tex]
where mPl is the Planck mass.

Let's rescale h by multiplying it by the Planck mass:
[tex]h = \frac{1}{m_{Pl}}{\tilde h}[/tex]
That makes the Lagrangian
[tex]L = \frac12 |\nabla {\tilde h}|^2 - \frac{1}{m_{Pl}}{\tilde h} \cdot T[/tex]

That makes interaction matrix elements proportional to the reciprocal of the Planck mass, and total process rates proportional to the reciprocal of the square of it. So,
[tex]\text{(process rate)} \sim \text{("normal" process rate)} \left( \frac{E}{m_{Pl}} \right)^2[/tex]

At the LHC's energies of about 1 TeV/parton, that's about 10-32. Thus, it will be VERY difficult to see evidence of individual gravitons at the LHC, as opposed to macroscopic, classical-limit gravity.
 
The "normal" graviton will be impossible to find with the LHC, but some models (in particular, models with extra dimensions) predict massive graviton-like particles that could be detectable.
CERN made a webpage for it, and searching for "graviton LHC" gives several publications about it.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
6K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K