- #1
yuiop
- 3,962
- 20
It seems to me that in an expanding universe where the expansion rate is accelerating, that the Hubble constant will be greater for near stars than the constant for far stars that were receding at lower rate at the time the light from them was emitted.
So when I see a cosmology calculator that asks me to enter a Hubble constant and the values for Omega(mass) and Omega(lambda) do I enter the Hubble constant for near or far far stars and when new values for the Hubble constant are announced do they mean the Hubble far, near or average constant?
So when I see a cosmology calculator that asks me to enter a Hubble constant and the values for Omega(mass) and Omega(lambda) do I enter the Hubble constant for near or far far stars and when new values for the Hubble constant are announced do they mean the Hubble far, near or average constant?