Is the ICUP Equation Flawed in Determining Comfortable Urinal Usage?

  • Thread starter Thread starter BobG
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    article
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion critically evaluates the ICUP (International Choice of Urinal Protocol) and its effectiveness in determining the optimal number of urinators for public restrooms. While the equations for the optimal and least efficient number of urinals appear sound, the equation assessing the maximum number of users without awkwardness is flawed. Specifically, it fails to account for social dynamics, such as the discomfort caused by individuals who exhibit signs of urgency, referred to as the "groaning 'cuz I had to pee so bad guy." This oversight suggests a need for a more nuanced approach to restroom design.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of restroom design principles
  • Familiarity with social dynamics in public spaces
  • Knowledge of the ICUP framework
  • Basic mathematical modeling skills
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the ICUP framework and its equations in detail
  • Explore social dynamics in public restroom usage
  • Investigate alternative models for restroom design
  • Analyze user behavior patterns in high-traffic restrooms
USEFUL FOR

Restroom designers, urban planners, sociologists studying public behavior, and facilities managers looking to optimize restroom usage and user comfort.

BobG
Science Advisor
Messages
352
Reaction score
87
An article on the ICUP (International Choice of Urinal Protocol) discusses the maximum number number of urinators that can utilize a public restroom without awkwardness. (ICUP)

The equations for the optimal number of urinals to install in a public restroom and the least efficient number of urinals to install both look good, but is there a problem in the equation that determines how many urinators can utilize a public restroom without awkwardness?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org


Certainly, but how do you factor in the akwardness caused by the "groaning 'cuz I had to pee so bad guy"?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 55 ·
2
Replies
55
Views
6K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
8K
  • · Replies 264 ·
9
Replies
264
Views
23K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
10K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K