Is the "Information Paradox" close to getting resolved?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the black hole information paradox and whether it is close to being resolved. Participants explore various perspectives on the paradox, including the views of notable physicists like Leonard Susskind and Stephen Hawking, and the implications of Black Hole Complementarity.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants clarify that the discussion pertains specifically to the black hole information paradox.
  • It is noted that opinions on the resolution of the paradox vary significantly among physicists, with some believing it is resolved while others feel more research is needed.
  • Susskind's position is described, suggesting that information is retained in a boundary layer outside the event horizon and encoded in Hawking radiation, though this view is not universally accepted.
  • Participants express uncertainty about the implications of Black Hole Complementarity, questioning whether it allows for information to be both preserved and lost simultaneously.
  • There is discussion about the nature of Hawking radiation, with some participants noting that it can consist of various particles, primarily photons, while adhering to conservation laws.
  • Concerns are raised regarding the chaotic nature of information emitted as Hawking radiation and whether it can be considered useful or preserved in a meaningful way.
  • Hawking's views on the chaotic nature of emitted information are contrasted with Susskind's belief in its preservation, highlighting ongoing debates in the field.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on whether the information paradox is resolved. There are multiple competing views regarding the preservation and loss of information, as well as the implications of Black Hole Complementarity.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty about the mechanisms by which information is preserved and returned to the universe, noting that current equations do not provide clarity on this aspect.

  • #31
Simple man said:
Sorry, I do not.

Then the best way for you to find the answer to your question is to look around in the literature until you find one.

Thread closed.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: weirdoguy

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 135 ·
5
Replies
135
Views
9K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
High School The M paradox
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
727