Is the Instantaneous Expansion of Space-Time Possible?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter StuartL
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Expansion Space-time
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the concept of instantaneous expansion of space-time and the implications of singularities within the universe. Participants argue that space-time exists continuously across past, present, and future, challenging the notion of "nothing" as a backdrop for expansion. The conversation highlights the confusion surrounding the terms used and emphasizes the need for a clearer understanding of special relativity and the shape of the universe. Ultimately, the thread was closed due to vague and inaccurate questions posed by participants.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of special relativity concepts
  • Familiarity with the nature of singularities in physics
  • Knowledge of the universe's expansion and collapse theories
  • Basic grasp of philosophical implications in scientific discussions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study "Einstein's Theory of Special Relativity" for foundational knowledge
  • Research "singularities in general relativity" to understand their implications
  • Explore "the shape of the universe" and its effects on cosmic expansion
  • Investigate "philosophical implications of time" in scientific discourse
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, cosmologists, philosophy students, and anyone interested in the complexities of space-time and the universe's structure.

StuartL
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Given that the expansion takes place "in nothing".

Given that all space-time exists all of the time. (past/present/future)

If the ultimate fate of the Universe is that it collapses back in upon itself.

Shouldn't a singularity of space-time occur instantaneously?

After all, all time existed in the "first instant" too.

Would this not then produce a singularity of space-time, within which the flow of time is specific to the "observer"?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Hello and :welcome: !

StuartL said:
Given that the expansion takes place "in nothing".
This is already confusing, as you probably associate empty space with that "nothing". There is no nothing.
Given that all space-time exists all of the time. (past/present/future)
Again misleading. It is as if you said: Given that all volume exists all of the length. (?)
If the ultimate fate of the Universe is that it collapses back in upon itself.
If ... then ...?
Shouldn't a singularity of space-time occur instantaneously?
Apart from the fact that these terms don't make sense in this ordering, who said it didn't (for whatever you meant)?
After all, all time existed in the "first instant" too.
Recursion. "first instance" already requires time.
Would this not then produce a singularity of space-time, within which the flow of time is specific to the "observer"?
I'm afraid your question is too vague and inaccurate to be answerable. You should read a book on special relativity before you start to "philosophy" about singularities. You could also do a forum search for "shape of the universe" or similar to find what already has been said on PF.

As this thread lacks a reasonable base, it is closed.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: davenn

Similar threads

  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K