Is the Mass of an Electron Arbitrary in Quantum Field Theory?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Student57
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Renormalization
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the concept of mass in Quantum Field Theory (QFT), specifically regarding the electron's mass and the implications of renormalization. It is established that while mass can be adjusted alongside the ultraviolet cutoff, the physical mass of the electron, known as the "pole mass," is not arbitrary and is determined by the propagator's pole at a specific energy. The distinction between the pole mass and the mass parameter in the Lagrangian is crucial, as the latter can vary depending on the renormalization scheme. Additionally, the inclusion of the finite mass term, m_0, in the renormalized mass equation m = m_0 + dm is necessary despite dm being significantly larger, as it affects physical calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Quantum Field Theory fundamentals
  • Understanding of renormalization techniques
  • Knowledge of propagators and their role in particle physics
  • Familiarity with the concept of ultraviolet cutoffs
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the concept of "pole mass" in Quantum Field Theory
  • Explore different renormalization schemes and their implications
  • Learn about the role of propagators in QFT calculations
  • Investigate the significance of ultraviolet cutoffs in theoretical physics
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, particularly those specializing in Quantum Field Theory, researchers in particle physics, and students seeking to deepen their understanding of mass renormalization and its implications in theoretical frameworks.

Student57
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I have a couple of questions regarding renormalization.

1. If it is possible to change mass as long as we do it simultaneously with changing ultraviolet cutoff, that would imply that the value we pick for mass is more or less arbitrary. If so, how come we have exact decimal value of mass of an electron, which doesn't look arbitrary at all?

2. When we write renormalized mass, m=m_0+dm, we have dm >>m_0. If so, why even include m_0 at all, why not throw it out as something negligible?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Student57 said:
1. If it is possible to change mass as long as we do it simultaneously with changing ultraviolet cutoff, that would imply that the value we pick for mass is more or less arbitrary. If so, how come we have exact decimal value of mass of an electron, which doesn't look arbitrary at all?

The propagator has a pole at a definite energy; this is the mass of the physical particle and is not arbitrary. We distinguish this "pole mass" from the mass parameter that appears in the Langrangian, which depending on your renormalization scheme may have a different value from the pole mass.

Student57 said:
2. When we write renormalized mass, m=m_0+dm, we have dm >>m_0. If so, why even include m_0 at all, why not throw it out as something negligible?

Just because dm is formally infinite doesn't mean the finite parts don't matter. We carefully arrange for the infinities to cancel in calculations of physical processes. Then changing the finite parts of the parameters changes the finite physical results.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
974
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 57 ·
2
Replies
57
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K