Is the New Font Less Readable and More Decorative?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Vanadium 50
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
The discussion centers around a recent font change, with participants expressing mixed feelings about readability and aesthetics. Many users find the new font, Roboto, less readable compared to the previous PT Sans, citing issues with kerning and overall density. Some participants suggest alternative fonts like Source Sans Pro, noting improvements in readability. There are also complaints about font size and rendering issues across different devices and browsers. Overall, the consensus leans towards preferring the old font for better readability, while some are still adjusting to the changes.
  • #31
Krylov said:
Don't know if that is intentional.
I see that too. Must have missed something.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
I have the impression that the font size in the edit box is smaller than it was.
 
  • #33
Samy_A said:
I have the impression that the font size in the edit box is smaller than it was.
Bizarre since I never touched anything with the editor
 
  • #34
Greg Bernhardt said:
Bizarre since I never touched anything with the editor
And now is again larger, as it was before.
Maybe it is not the font size but the change from sans serif->serif->sans serif that gave me that impression.

Anyway, it's good now (for me at least), thanks.
 
  • #35
Krylov said:
...
Actually, as I'm typing this, I see that the font in the composition box is still serif. Don't know if that is intentional.
Greg Bernhardt said:
Back to PT Sans. Oddly I just cycled through some very common Google fonts. Not sure why they didn't work here.
I think it works
HTML:
<link href="//fonts.googleapis.com/css?family=PT+Sans:400,600" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css">
CSS:
html{...
font-size:16px;font-family:'PT Sans',san-serif;line-height:1.5;...}
 
  • #36
Samy_A said:
And now is again larger, as it was before.
I did increase by 1pt. Did you like the size before at 15pt? Personally I have my browser zoom set to 110% so before the text was too small for me to read easily.
 
  • Like
Likes phinds
  • #37
Greg Bernhardt said:
I did increase by 1pt. Did you like the size before at 15pt? Personally I have my browser zoom set to 110% so before the text was too small for me to read easily.
It's fine now, but thanks for the 110% tip. Just applied that too and it makes it much better for me.
 
  • #38
  • #39
Samy_A said:
It's fine now, but thanks for the 110% tip. Just applied that too and it makes it much better for me.
So I'm confused, you think at 100% the post text is still too small?
 
  • #40
Greg Bernhardt said:
So I'm confused, you think at 100% the post text is still too small?
No, sorry for the confusion. It's fine now, also at 100%. But, without any connection to your tweaking of the website, I now noticed that I like it more at 110%.
 
  • Like
Likes Greg Bernhardt
  • #41
Greg Bernhardt said:
I did increase by 1pt. Did you like the size before at 15pt? Personally I have my browser zoom set to 110% so before the text was too small for me to read easily.
I'm w/ you Greg. I found the old a bit hard so magnified my browser
 
  • #42
phinds said:
I'm w/ you Greg. I found the old a bit hard so magnified my browser
How about now as I increased it by 1pt from yesterday?
 
  • Like
Likes Silicon Waffle and Psinter
  • #43
Greg Bernhardt said:
How about now as I increased it by 1pt from yesterday?
Can't tell w/o side by side since although I have a memory like an elephant, I keep forgetting where I put the peanuts and I'm not sure where I have my browser settings vs where they were when I changed them to make PF a bit more readable. I certainly can't remember anything from as way far back as yesterday :smile:

I can say that whatever it is now, it works so quit screwing around and go do something useful like drinking beer.
 
  • Like
Likes jim mcnamara
  • #44
My feedback is that I like it now.

EDIT: The g of Greg is still a little cutted off. But I still like it now.
 
  • Like
Likes Silicon Waffle
  • #45
I also see the forums texts by default are a little small. I have to zoom them into get a better view. I find the body text looks good at size of 15px. And Greg can show his g part that is being cut off if the username's top value becomes smaller. Come on Greg! Show us your "g" please.
 
  • Like
Likes Mondayman
  • #46
Silicon Waffle said:
I also see the forums texts by default are a little small. I have to zoom them into get a better view. I find the body text looks good at size of 15px. And Greg can show his g part that is being cut off if the username's top value becomes smaller. Come on Greg! Show us your "g" please.
Oh, god no, not his g. I really don't want to see his g.
 
  • Like
Likes Silicon Waffle
  • #47
I don't get it phinds.

To be honest, in between all the font changes at one point I thought it said: Greq. And almost made a thread to ask whether it was Greg or Greq because I felt something was off.
 
  • #48
Psinter said:
I don't get it phinds.

To be honest, in between all the font changes at one point I thought it said: Greq. And almost made a thread to ask whether it was Greg or Greq because I felt something was off.
Uh ... you need to lighten up. Not everything is meant seriously.
 
  • #49
phinds said:
Uh ... you need to lighten up. Not everything is meant seriously.
Ah, now I can laugh at it. Hahaha! I read it now and it's funny, for real. :thumbup:
 
  • #50
upload_2016-2-9_10-32-29.png
I see this with BOTH browsers (IE11 & Chome) and have for quite a while. Cleared cookies for both. Descenders for lettters are not there. No biggie.
 
  • #51
The equation pushes the bottom line down. In general latex should not be in titles
 
  • #52
Thank you, that clears up something.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K