Is the New Font Less Readable and More Decorative?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Vanadium 50
  • Start date Start date
  • #31
Krylov said:
Don't know if that is intentional.
I see that too. Must have missed something.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
I have the impression that the font size in the edit box is smaller than it was.
 
  • #33
Samy_A said:
I have the impression that the font size in the edit box is smaller than it was.
Bizarre since I never touched anything with the editor
 
  • #34
Greg Bernhardt said:
Bizarre since I never touched anything with the editor
And now is again larger, as it was before.
Maybe it is not the font size but the change from sans serif->serif->sans serif that gave me that impression.

Anyway, it's good now (for me at least), thanks.
 
  • #35
Krylov said:
...
Actually, as I'm typing this, I see that the font in the composition box is still serif. Don't know if that is intentional.
Greg Bernhardt said:
Back to PT Sans. Oddly I just cycled through some very common Google fonts. Not sure why they didn't work here.
I think it works
HTML:
<link href="//fonts.googleapis.com/css?family=PT+Sans:400,600" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css">
CSS:
html{...
font-size:16px;font-family:'PT Sans',san-serif;line-height:1.5;...}
 
  • #36
Samy_A said:
And now is again larger, as it was before.
I did increase by 1pt. Did you like the size before at 15pt? Personally I have my browser zoom set to 110% so before the text was too small for me to read easily.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: phinds
  • #37
Greg Bernhardt said:
I did increase by 1pt. Did you like the size before at 15pt? Personally I have my browser zoom set to 110% so before the text was too small for me to read easily.
It's fine now, but thanks for the 110% tip. Just applied that too and it makes it much better for me.
 
  • #38
  • #39
Samy_A said:
It's fine now, but thanks for the 110% tip. Just applied that too and it makes it much better for me.
So I'm confused, you think at 100% the post text is still too small?
 
  • #40
Greg Bernhardt said:
So I'm confused, you think at 100% the post text is still too small?
No, sorry for the confusion. It's fine now, also at 100%. But, without any connection to your tweaking of the website, I now noticed that I like it more at 110%.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Greg Bernhardt
  • #41
Greg Bernhardt said:
I did increase by 1pt. Did you like the size before at 15pt? Personally I have my browser zoom set to 110% so before the text was too small for me to read easily.
I'm w/ you Greg. I found the old a bit hard so magnified my browser
 
  • #42
phinds said:
I'm w/ you Greg. I found the old a bit hard so magnified my browser
How about now as I increased it by 1pt from yesterday?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Silicon Waffle and Psinter
  • #43
Greg Bernhardt said:
How about now as I increased it by 1pt from yesterday?
Can't tell w/o side by side since although I have a memory like an elephant, I keep forgetting where I put the peanuts and I'm not sure where I have my browser settings vs where they were when I changed them to make PF a bit more readable. I certainly can't remember anything from as way far back as yesterday :smile:

I can say that whatever it is now, it works so quit screwing around and go do something useful like drinking beer.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jim mcnamara
  • #44
My feedback is that I like it now.

EDIT: The g of Greg is still a little cutted off. But I still like it now.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Silicon Waffle
  • #45
I also see the forums texts by default are a little small. I have to zoom them into get a better view. I find the body text looks good at size of 15px. And Greg can show his g part that is being cut off if the username's top value becomes smaller. Come on Greg! Show us your "g" please.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Mondayman
  • #46
Silicon Waffle said:
I also see the forums texts by default are a little small. I have to zoom them into get a better view. I find the body text looks good at size of 15px. And Greg can show his g part that is being cut off if the username's top value becomes smaller. Come on Greg! Show us your "g" please.
Oh, god no, not his g. I really don't want to see his g.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Silicon Waffle
  • #47
I don't get it phinds.

To be honest, in between all the font changes at one point I thought it said: Greq. And almost made a thread to ask whether it was Greg or Greq because I felt something was off.
 
  • #48
Psinter said:
I don't get it phinds.

To be honest, in between all the font changes at one point I thought it said: Greq. And almost made a thread to ask whether it was Greg or Greq because I felt something was off.
Uh ... you need to lighten up. Not everything is meant seriously.
 
  • #49
phinds said:
Uh ... you need to lighten up. Not everything is meant seriously.
Ah, now I can laugh at it. Hahaha! I read it now and it's funny, for real. :thumbup:
 
  • #50
upload_2016-2-9_10-32-29.png
I see this with BOTH browsers (IE11 & Chome) and have for quite a while. Cleared cookies for both. Descenders for lettters are not there. No biggie.
 
  • #51
The equation pushes the bottom line down. In general latex should not be in titles
 
  • #52
Thank you, that clears up something.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
7K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
983