Is the Noether current physically observable in experiments?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter kau
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Current Physical
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the physical observability of Noether currents derived from Lagrangians in quantum field theory. Two currents are presented: the first, $$ J^{\mu}=i(\partial^{\mu} \phi \phi^{*} -\partial^{\mu} \phi^{*} \phi) $$, arises from a free field Lagrangian, while the second, $$ J^{\mu}=i(D^{\mu}\phi \phi^{*} -D^{\mu}\phi^{*} \phi) $$, is derived from a local gauge-invariant Lagrangian. Both currents are identified as physical within their respective theories, emphasizing that they reflect the symmetries of the Lagrangian rather than being directly observable in experiments. The discussion also touches on the implications of conserved currents in gauge theories, particularly in contexts like AdS/CFT.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Noether's theorem and its application in quantum field theory
  • Familiarity with Lagrangian mechanics and field theory
  • Knowledge of gauge invariance and its implications in particle physics
  • Basic concepts of symmetry groups in theoretical physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of Noether currents from various Lagrangians in quantum field theory
  • Explore the implications of gauge invariance in quantum field theories
  • Investigate the role of conserved currents in the context of AdS/CFT correspondence
  • Examine experimental methods for detecting effects of conserved quantities in particle physics
USEFUL FOR

The discussion is beneficial for theoretical physicists, quantum field theorists, and graduate students studying particle physics, particularly those interested in the implications of symmetries and conserved currents in field theories.

kau
Messages
53
Reaction score
0
I have very simple questions. Although these are simple but I am confused. So if I start with a lagrangian of the following form $$ \mathcal{L} = \partial^{\mu}\phi \partial_{\mu} \phi^{*} -m^{2} \phi^{*} \phi $$ then I get a current for the global invariance of the lagrangian and that is of the form $$ J^{\mu}=i(\partial^{\mu} \phi \phi^{*} -\partial^{\mu} \phi^{*} \phi) ... (1 )$$Then if I demand local gauge invariance then definitely we get gauge field terms in the lagrangian. Then if we find an expression of current for the global invariance of ##\phi## field we get expression $$ J^{\mu}=i(D^{\mu}\phi \phi^{*} -D^{\mu}\phi^{*} \phi) ...(2) $$ And there is other expression for current which is conserved on local gauge invariance but they are not physical since they are not gauge invariant. But global ones are gauge invariant and therefore it's ok to have their physical presence in the theory. But I am confused that which one is physical 1 or 2 or both? One more thing is these currents or the global charge defined from it is due to the symmetry of the theory ,not external ones. So in principle we don't see them. Is this right?
Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Noether currents are symmetry currents. They depend on the fields (in the Lagrangian) and their transformations laws under the symmetry group of the Lagrangian. Your first current follows from the Free fields Lagrangian \mathcal{L}_{0} = \mathcal{L}_{0}(\varphi_{a} , \partial_{\mu}\varphi_{a}) , using J_{(1)}^{\mu} = \frac{\partial \mathcal{L}_{0}}{\partial (\partial_{\mu}\varphi_{a})} \delta \varphi_{a} .
Your second current follows from a different Lagrangian \mathcal{L} = \mathcal{L} = \mathcal{L}(\varphi_{a} , \partial_{\mu}\varphi_{a} - i A_{\mu}\varphi_{a}) . This Lagrangian describes an interacting field theory, its symmetry current is J_{(2)}^{\mu} = \frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial (\partial_{\mu}\varphi_{a})} \delta \varphi_{a} = \frac{\partial{L}}{\partial A_{\mu}} . Comparing the two currents is like comparing apples with oranges. They are the global symmetry currents of two different theories. Therefore, each current is the physical current of the corresponding theory.

Sam
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71 and kau
samalkhaiat said:
Noether currents are symmetry currents. They depend on the fields (in the Lagrangian) and their transformations laws under the symmetry group of the Lagrangian. Your first current follows from the Free fields Lagrangian \mathcal{L}_{0} = \mathcal{L}_{0}(\varphi_{a} , \partial_{\mu}\varphi_{a}) , using J_{(1)}^{\mu} = \frac{\partial \mathcal{L}_{0}}{\partial (\partial_{\mu}\varphi_{a})} \delta \varphi_{a} .
Your second current follows from a different Lagrangian \mathcal{L} = \mathcal{L} = \mathcal{L}(\varphi_{a} , \partial_{\mu}\varphi_{a} - i A_{\mu}\varphi_{a}) . This Lagrangian describes an interacting field theory, its symmetry current is J_{(2)}^{\mu} = \frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial (\partial_{\mu}\varphi_{a})} \delta \varphi_{a} = \frac{\partial{L}}{\partial A_{\mu}} . Comparing the two currents is like comparing apples with oranges. They are the global symmetry currents of two different theories. Therefore, each current is the physical current of the corresponding theory.

Sam
Ok. thanks for the response. I have another concern about this. Does this current have anything to do with experiments? can you see them in the experiment or something like that. Or this current just signify the symmetry of the theory and to some extent we can infer if there is some conserved thing like that then there is some matter present that is like having finite chemical potential. That's it.
Another thing is in Schwartz's qft book it is mentioned that in fixed spacetime dimension this thing is true although if that is not the case ( e.g. AdS/CFT) then we can have the global current conserved in gauge theory. Can you elucidate this part?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
6K