MHB Is the Orthogonal Complement of an Invariant Subspace Itself Invariant?

Sudharaka
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
1,558
Reaction score
1
Hi everyone, :)

Here's a question with my answer. I would be really grateful if somebody could confirm whether my answer is correct. :)

Problem:

Prove that the orthogonal compliment \(U^\perp\) to an invariant subspace \(U\) with respect to a Hermitian transformation is itself invariant.

My Answer:

Let \(B\) denote the associated bilinear form, and \(f\) denote the Hermitian transformation. Then we have to show that, \(f(U^\perp)\subset U^\perp\). That is,

\[B(f(u'),\,u)=0\]

for all \(u\in U\) where \(u'\in U^\perp\).

Take any \(u'\in U^\perp\). Then for any \(u\in U\),

\[B(f(u'),\,u)=B(u',\,f^*(u))\]

Now since \(f\) is Hermitian (self-adjoint) we have, \(f=f^*\). Therefore,

\[B(f(u'),\,u)=B(u',\,f(u))\]

Now since \(U\) is an invariant subspace, \(f(u)\in f(U)\subset U\). Therefore,

\[B(f(u'),\,u)=B(u',\,f(u))=0\]

Am I correct? :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sudharaka said:
Hi everyone, :)

Here's a question with my answer. I would be really grateful if somebody could confirm whether my answer is correct. :)

Problem:

Prove that the orthogonal compliment \(U^\perp\) to an invariant subspace \(U\) with respect to a Hermitian transformation is itself invariant.

My Answer:

Let \(B\) denote the associated bilinear form, and \(f\) denote the Hermitian transformation. Then we have to show that, \(f(U^\perp)\subset U^\perp\). That is,

\[B(f(u'),\,u)=0\]

for all \(u\in U\) where \(u'\in U^\perp\).

Take any \(u'\in U^\perp\). Then for any \(u\in U\),

\[B(f(u'),\,u)=B(u',\,f^*(u))\]

Now since \(f\) is Hermitian (self-adjoint) we have, \(f=f^*\). Therefore,

\[B(f(u'),\,u)=B(u',\,f(u))\]

Now since \(U\) is an invariant subspace, \(f(u)\in f(U)\subset U\). Therefore,

\[B(f(u'),\,u)=B(u',\,f(u))=0\]

Am I correct? :)
Yes. :)
 
Opalg said:
Yes. :)

Thanks for the confirmation. :)
 
The world of 2\times 2 complex matrices is very colorful. They form a Banach-algebra, they act on spinors, they contain the quaternions, SU(2), su(2), SL(2,\mathbb C), sl(2,\mathbb C). Furthermore, with the determinant as Euclidean or pseudo-Euclidean norm, isu(2) is a 3-dimensional Euclidean space, \mathbb RI\oplus isu(2) is a Minkowski space with signature (1,3), i\mathbb RI\oplus su(2) is a Minkowski space with signature (3,1), SU(2) is the double cover of SO(3), sl(2,\mathbb C) is the...

Similar threads

Back
Top