Is the Pre-image of a Borel Set Measurable?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Chris L T521
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the measurability of pre-images of Borel sets under measurable functions. Specifically, it establishes that if \( f \) is a measurable function defined on a measure space \( (X, \Lambda, \mu) \), then the pre-image \( f^{-1}(B) \) of any Borel set \( B \subseteq \mathbb{R} \) is contained within the sigma-algebra \( \Lambda \). This conclusion is crucial for understanding the relationship between measurable functions and Borel sets in measure theory.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of measurable functions in measure theory
  • Familiarity with Borel sets and their properties
  • Knowledge of sigma-algebras and measure spaces
  • Basic concepts of real analysis
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of Borel sets in detail
  • Explore the concept of sigma-algebras and their applications
  • Learn about measurable functions and their implications in analysis
  • Investigate the relationship between measurable functions and Lebesgue integration
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of analysis, and researchers in measure theory who are looking to deepen their understanding of the properties of measurable functions and their interactions with Borel sets.

Chris L T521
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
913
Reaction score
0
Here's this week's problem.

-----

Problem: Let $f$ be a measurable function on a measure space $(X,\Lambda,\mu)$. Show that the pre-image of any Borel set of $\mathbb{R}$ is also in $\Lambda$.

-----

 
Physics news on Phys.org
No one answered this week's question. Here's my solution.
Proof: Let $f$ be measurable and let $B\subset\mathbb{R}$ be a Borel set. Let $\mathcal{F}=\{E\subset\mathbb{R}:f^{-1}(E)\in\Lambda\}$ be a collection of sets. Assuming that $E\in\mathcal{F}$, then
\[f^{-1}(E^c)=(f^{-1}(E))^c\text{ is measurable}.\]

Therefore, $E^c\in\mathcal{F}$. Now, suppose $\{E_i\}\in\mathcal{F}$ is a sequence of sets. Then\[f^{-1}(\bigcup E_i)=\bigcup f^{-1}(E_i)\text{ is measurable}.\]Therefore, $\bigcup E_i\in\mathcal{F}$. Thus, $\mathcal{F}$ is a $\sigma$-algebra.Now, note that for any $a,b\in\mathbb{R}$ with $a<b$, the sets $\{x:f(x)>a\}$ and $\{x:f(x)<b\}$ are both measurable. Thus, it follows that $(a,\infty),(-\infty,b)\in\mathcal{F}$. Thus, $(a,b)=(a,\infty)\cap(-\infty,b)\in\mathcal{F}$. Therefore, the $\sigma$-algebra $\mathcal{F}$ contains all open sets, which implies that all Borel sets $B$ are in $\mathcal{F}$. Thus, $f^{-1}(B)$ is measurable.Q.E.D.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K