MHB Is the solution to the quadratic inequality (-x + 6)/(x - 2) < 0?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mathdad
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Quadratic
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving the quadratic inequality (-x + 6)/(x - 2) < 0. The critical points identified are x = 2 and x = 6, which must be excluded from the solution set. Testing intervals reveals that the solution is valid for (-infinity, 2) and (6, infinity). The participants emphasize the importance of correctly setting up the inequality and checking the signs of the intervals. The final solution is confirmed as (-infinity, 2) U (6, infinity).
mathdad
Messages
1,280
Reaction score
0
Solve the quadratic inequality.

2x/(x - 2) < 3

Multiply both sides by (x - 2).

[(x - 2)][2x/(x - 2)] < 3(x - 2)

2x < 3x - 6

2x - 3x < -6

-x < -6

x > 6

Our only end point is x = 6.

<----------(6)---------->

For (-infinity, 6), let x = 0. In this interval, we get false.

For (6, infinity), let x = 7. In this interval, we get true.

Test x = 6.

2(6)/(6 - 2) < 3

12/4 < 3

3 < 3...false statement. We exclude x = 6 as part of the solution.

Solution:

(6, infinity)

Correct?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
You don't want to multiply an inequality by an expression whose sign is unknown...arrange everything to one side and then get your critical values from the roots of the numerator and denominator. :D
 
Are you saying the correct set up is

2x/(x - 2) - 3 < 0?
 
RTCNTC said:
Are you saying the correct set up is

2x/(x - 2) - 3 < 0?

Yes, now combine terms on the LHS...:D
 
Cool. I will work on this quadratic inequality later. I sure wish I had a better understanding of mathematics.
 
2x/(x - 2) - 3 < 0

After combining, I got the following:

(-x + 6)/(x - 2) < 0

-x + 6 = 0

x = 6

x - 2 = 0

x = 2

<--------(2)--------(6)---------->

When x = 6, we get 0/(x - 2) < 0.

When x = 2, we get undefined.

We must exclude 2 and 6.

For (-infinity, 2), let x = 0. Here we get a true statement.

For (2, 6), let x = 3. Here we get a false statement.

For (6, infinity), let x = 7. Here we get a true statement.

Solution: (-infinity, 2) U (6, infinity)

Correct?
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...

Similar threads

Back
Top