MHB Is the solution to the quadratic inequality (-x + 6)/(x - 2) < 0?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mathdad
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Quadratic
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving the quadratic inequality (-x + 6)/(x - 2) < 0. The critical points identified are x = 2 and x = 6, which must be excluded from the solution set. Testing intervals reveals that the solution is valid for (-infinity, 2) and (6, infinity). The participants emphasize the importance of correctly setting up the inequality and checking the signs of the intervals. The final solution is confirmed as (-infinity, 2) U (6, infinity).
mathdad
Messages
1,280
Reaction score
0
Solve the quadratic inequality.

2x/(x - 2) < 3

Multiply both sides by (x - 2).

[(x - 2)][2x/(x - 2)] < 3(x - 2)

2x < 3x - 6

2x - 3x < -6

-x < -6

x > 6

Our only end point is x = 6.

<----------(6)---------->

For (-infinity, 6), let x = 0. In this interval, we get false.

For (6, infinity), let x = 7. In this interval, we get true.

Test x = 6.

2(6)/(6 - 2) < 3

12/4 < 3

3 < 3...false statement. We exclude x = 6 as part of the solution.

Solution:

(6, infinity)

Correct?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
You don't want to multiply an inequality by an expression whose sign is unknown...arrange everything to one side and then get your critical values from the roots of the numerator and denominator. :D
 
Are you saying the correct set up is

2x/(x - 2) - 3 < 0?
 
RTCNTC said:
Are you saying the correct set up is

2x/(x - 2) - 3 < 0?

Yes, now combine terms on the LHS...:D
 
Cool. I will work on this quadratic inequality later. I sure wish I had a better understanding of mathematics.
 
2x/(x - 2) - 3 < 0

After combining, I got the following:

(-x + 6)/(x - 2) < 0

-x + 6 = 0

x = 6

x - 2 = 0

x = 2

<--------(2)--------(6)---------->

When x = 6, we get 0/(x - 2) < 0.

When x = 2, we get undefined.

We must exclude 2 and 6.

For (-infinity, 2), let x = 0. Here we get a true statement.

For (2, 6), let x = 3. Here we get a false statement.

For (6, infinity), let x = 7. Here we get a true statement.

Solution: (-infinity, 2) U (6, infinity)

Correct?
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...

Similar threads

Back
Top