Is the solution to the quadratic inequality (-x + 6)/(x - 2) < 0?

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter mathdad
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Quadratic
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around solving the quadratic inequality (-x + 6)/(x - 2) < 0, with participants exploring different methods for finding the solution set. The scope includes mathematical reasoning and problem-solving techniques related to inequalities.

Discussion Character

  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes a method involving multiplying both sides of the inequality by (x - 2), leading to the conclusion that the solution is (6, infinity).
  • Another participant cautions against multiplying by an expression with an unknown sign and suggests rearranging the inequality to find critical values from the roots of the numerator and denominator.
  • A participant confirms the rearranged form of the inequality as 2x/(x - 2) - 3 < 0 and proceeds to combine terms.
  • After combining, a participant derives the critical points x = 6 and x = 2, noting that both must be excluded from the solution set.
  • Testing intervals, one participant finds that the solution includes (-infinity, 2) and (6, infinity).

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the method of solving the inequality, with no consensus on the correct approach or final solution. Some support the initial method while others advocate for a different strategy.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved assumptions regarding the sign of (x - 2) during multiplication, and the implications of critical points on the solution set remain contested.

mathdad
Messages
1,280
Reaction score
0
Solve the quadratic inequality.

2x/(x - 2) < 3

Multiply both sides by (x - 2).

[(x - 2)][2x/(x - 2)] < 3(x - 2)

2x < 3x - 6

2x - 3x < -6

-x < -6

x > 6

Our only end point is x = 6.

<----------(6)---------->

For (-infinity, 6), let x = 0. In this interval, we get false.

For (6, infinity), let x = 7. In this interval, we get true.

Test x = 6.

2(6)/(6 - 2) < 3

12/4 < 3

3 < 3...false statement. We exclude x = 6 as part of the solution.

Solution:

(6, infinity)

Correct?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
You don't want to multiply an inequality by an expression whose sign is unknown...arrange everything to one side and then get your critical values from the roots of the numerator and denominator. :D
 
Are you saying the correct set up is

2x/(x - 2) - 3 < 0?
 
RTCNTC said:
Are you saying the correct set up is

2x/(x - 2) - 3 < 0?

Yes, now combine terms on the LHS...:D
 
Cool. I will work on this quadratic inequality later. I sure wish I had a better understanding of mathematics.
 
2x/(x - 2) - 3 < 0

After combining, I got the following:

(-x + 6)/(x - 2) < 0

-x + 6 = 0

x = 6

x - 2 = 0

x = 2

<--------(2)--------(6)---------->

When x = 6, we get 0/(x - 2) < 0.

When x = 2, we get undefined.

We must exclude 2 and 6.

For (-infinity, 2), let x = 0. Here we get a true statement.

For (2, 6), let x = 3. Here we get a false statement.

For (6, infinity), let x = 7. Here we get a true statement.

Solution: (-infinity, 2) U (6, infinity)

Correct?
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K