Is the Sun’s position in the Galaxy close to its predecessor’s position?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Gannet
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Galaxy Position
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the origins of the solar system, specifically the hypothesis that it formed from the remnants of supernovae. Participants assert that the solar system may be the product of at least ten supernovae occurring approximately 6 billion years ago, with some suggesting the Sun itself may have a more complex history involving a prior supernova event. Key concepts include the gravitational collapse of gas clouds, the role of neutron stars, and the process of neutron emission. Theories are supported by references to cosmochemistry and specific scientific literature.

PREREQUISITES
  • Nebular theory of solar system formation
  • Understanding of supernova and neutron star processes
  • Familiarity with cosmochemistry
  • Basic knowledge of nuclear physics and stellar evolution
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the role of supernovae in solar system formation
  • Study neutron star evolution and neutron emission processes
  • Explore the field of cosmochemistry and its implications for stellar origins
  • Read "The Sun is a plasma diffuser that sorts atoms by mass," Physics of Atomic Nuclei 69 (2009) for detailed insights
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, astrophysicists, and students of cosmology interested in the formation and evolution of the solar system and stellar processes.

Gannet
Messages
113
Reaction score
3
Since nebular theory states that our solar system formed from the gravitational collapse of a giant gas cloud.

Could this giant gas cloud be the remnants of its predecessor’s nova?
 
Last edited:
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Most likely. A lot of the initial elements that were used to form our solar system in the first place were remnants of older, more massive stars that went nova/supernova. Another possibility was the gas cloud could've just been leftovers of some other stars forming, but I doubt that. I'd go with your assumption being right, but someone correct me if I'm wrong. (:
 
Thanks for replying Calluuuum

I have seen that some believe that the solar system is the product of 10 supernovas that happen ~6 bya. Personally, considering the vast distances (light-years) between stars, I find this statement very unlikely and difficult to put credence in. That is why I conjecture that our solar system is the product nearby red giant that went supernova >5 bya and then condensed into our solar system.

Actually, I was thinking of coining term 'oscillating star' similar in idea to oscillating universe.
 
The solar system IS the remnant of at least 10 supernova that occurred over the last ~6 billion years. Google on cosmochemistry.
 
Hi Chronos

Chronos said:
... Google on cosmochemistry.

I did Google cosmochemistry, didn't find anything yet about 10 supernova; however, I did found the following theory at http://www.physorg.com/news167302986.html"

In the comment section there is the following reply to a previous question

BOTH ANSWERS ARE YES ! YOU ARE EXACTLY RIGHT !

1. Isn't it also a possibility that our sun has a much older history than now accepted? Maybe it was a supernova itself, then neutron star, which "evaporated" into a new much lower mass star of mostly hydrogen gas. Some of remnants of the supernova are the matter orbiting our sun today, including the Earth and us.

2. Now the question is how would a neutron star evaporate?

ANSWERS:

1a. Our Sun has a much older history.
1b. It exploded as the supernova 5 Gyr ago
---[Based on combined U/Pb and Pu/Xe age dating.
1c. It ejected all of the material that now orbits the Sun.
1d. Neutron stars "evaporate" by neutron emission
---[Driven by repulsive interactions between neutrons].
1e. The free neutrons decay to protons and electrons.
1f. Strong magnet fields at the core accelerate protons upward by strong.
---[Protons from the core are the carrier gas that maintains mass separation]
1g. Most protons are fused into He-4 during the upward journey
---[This generates 35% of solar luminosity; 100% of solar neutrinos]
1h. 50,000 billion metric ton of H reach the solar surface annually
---[This generates 100% of the solar wind Hydrogen].

2. Neutron-emission, driven by repulsive interactions between neutrons.

All this was explained in detail over the past 30 years and is summarized in "The Sun is a plasma diffuser that sorts atoms by mass," Physics of Atomic Nuclei 69 (2009) 1847-1856; Yadernaya Fizika 69, number 11, (November 2006); PAC: 96.20.Dt DOI: 10.1134/S106377880611007X
http://arxiv.org/.../0609509

With kind regards,
Oliver K. Manuel

I will continue the Google search
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 53 ·
2
Replies
53
Views
8K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 52 ·
2
Replies
52
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K