swampwiz
- 567
- 83
An interesting essay:
The discussion revolves around the value and relevance of theoretical physics, particularly in light of criticisms regarding its focus and the perceived waste of intellectual resources. Participants explore various perspectives on the significance of theoretical pursuits, the naturalness problem, and the career trajectories of physicists.
Participants express a range of opinions, with no clear consensus on the value of theoretical physics or the implications of criticisms. Some view the criticisms as valid, while others see them as unfounded or redundant.
Participants acknowledge the complexity of the issues surrounding theoretical physics, including the influence of personal biases and the nature of scientific progress. There are unresolved questions regarding the motivations of physicists and the societal implications of their work.
This discussion may be of interest to those engaged in theoretical physics, philosophy of science, or the career trajectories of scientists, as well as individuals curious about the intersection of science and societal perceptions.
That's trivial as there are more PhD positions than permanent positions, and some physics topics don't exist outside academia.jasonRF said:all I know is that many physics PhDs trained In those fields do not stay in them.