Is there a better way to do this?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter StatusX
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on solving a pair of differential equations involving functions a, b, c, and d with respect to the variable x. The user successfully derives an expression for b and subsequently for a, using the equations: a + (db/dx) = 0 and ac + (d(bc)/dx) = d. The user expresses concern about the redundancy of using the first equation twice and seeks alternative methods for simplification. Suggestions include expressing b in terms of an integral and substituting it back into the second equation to eliminate b entirely.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of differential equations
  • Familiarity with calculus, specifically derivatives and integrals
  • Knowledge of function notation and manipulation
  • Experience with solving systems of equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore methods for solving systems of differential equations
  • Learn about integrating factors in differential equations
  • Investigate substitution techniques in calculus
  • Study the application of the method of characteristics
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, engineering students, and anyone involved in solving complex differential equations or seeking to improve their problem-solving techniques in calculus.

StatusX
Homework Helper
Messages
2,570
Reaction score
2
I have the pair of equations:

[tex]a+\frac{db}{dx}=0[/tex]

[tex]ac+\frac{d(bc)}{dx}=d[/tex]

where a,b,c,d are functions of x. I want to solve for a in terms of c and d. I can do it as follows. Start with the second equation:

[tex]ac+\frac{d(bc)}{dx}=ac+c\frac{db}{dx}+b\frac{dc}{dx}=d[/tex]

Now plug in the first equation:

[tex]ac+c(-a)+b\frac{dc}{dx}=b\frac{dc}{dx}=d[/tex]

Now we have an expression for b, so using the first equation again:

[tex]a=-\frac{d}{dx}\left( \frac{d}{dc/dx} \right)[/tex]

My problem is with using the first equation twice. It seems redundant, but I can't find another way to do it. Can anyone think of a better way, or maybe point out why there isn't one?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You might try writing

[tex]b = b_0 - \int a dx[/tex]

from the the first equation and substitute into the second equation. You can ultimately write this as a differential equation for a having eliminated b.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K