Solving a system of equations with 5 unknowns

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter hmparticle9
  • Start date Start date
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
10 replies · 2K views
hmparticle9
Messages
157
Reaction score
26
I am solving Schrödingers equation with a potential with two "delta" spikes: One at ##a## and another at ##-a##, with magnitude ##-\alpha##. In the process of looking for scattering solutions I have come across the following four equations:

$$A + B \beta = C + D \beta$$
$$C \beta + D = F \beta$$
$$ik(C - D\beta - A + B\beta) = \delta (A+B\beta)$$
$$ik(F\beta - C\beta + D) = \delta F \beta$$

where ##\beta = e^{2ika}## and ##\delta = -\frac{2m\alpha}{h^2}##.


##A,B,C,D,F## are (possibly) complex numbers. ##k## is a constant. ##i## is the square root of ##-1##.

I need to find the transmission coefficient of the problem, which basically means I need the quantity:

$$\frac{|F|^2}{|A|^2}$$

which means I need to find ##A## in terms of ##F##, or more so the other way around. ##F## in terms of ##A##.

I have ##F## in terms of ##C## and ##D##:

$$C \beta + D = F \beta$$

I have found $$C = (\frac{\delta}{2ik} +1) A + \frac{\delta \beta}{2ik}B$$
and $$D = -\frac{\delta}{2ik\beta} A + (1-\frac{\delta}{2ik}) B$$

I have put these values in the equation

$$A + B \beta = C + D \beta$$

to verify correctness. All I need to do now is find a relationship between ##A## and ##B##.

This I am struggling with. Could someone give me a hand?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
My bad. I made a mistake in the title. I have 5 unknowns.
 
How do I delete questions? I solved it by hand in the end. Quite simple but tedious work
 
hmparticle9 said:
How do I delete questions? I solved it by hand in the end. Quite simple but tedious work
Why not answer your own question and show us the solution? It will help others who will read your thread.
 
Reply
  • Agree
Likes   Reactions: Mark44
I have provided an outline. Two reasons. The algebra is intense, and my workings are now in the local skip.

Quick sheets - page 2.webp
 
I used for convenience the parameters ##ik=n\, , \,b=\beta\, , \,d=\delta## and set up the equation system
\begin{align*}
\begin{pmatrix}1&1&-1&-1\\-n-d&bn-db&n&-bn\\0&0&-db&2n-d\\0&0&0&1
\end{pmatrix}&\cdot
\begin{pmatrix}A\\B\\C\\D\end{pmatrix} =
\begin{pmatrix}0\\0 \\0\\ D\end{pmatrix}\\
\end{align*}
where I hopefully didn't make typos. Then I fed
https://www.symbolab.com/solver/matrix-calculator/\left(d-db+nb+n\right)\begin{pmatrix}1&1&-1&-1\\ -n-d&bn-db&n&-bn\\ 0&0&-db&2n-d\\ 0&0&0&1\end{pmatrix}^{\left(-1\right)}?or=input
to do me the inversion. This resulted in
\begin{align*}
\dfrac{1}{d-db+nb+n}
\begin{pmatrix}-db+nb&-1&\frac{db-nb-n}{db}&-\frac{d^2b^2-d^2b+nd+3ndb-2n^2-2n^2b}{db}\\ d+n&1&-\frac{1}{b}&-\frac{-nb^2-nb-db+d-2n}{b}\\ 0&0&-\frac{d-db+nb+n}{db}&\frac{\left(-d+2n\right)\left(d-db+nb+n\right)}{db}\\ 0&0&0&d-db+nb+n\end{pmatrix}
\end{align*}
so my result is
\begin{align*}
(d-db+nb+n)\begin{pmatrix}A\\B\\C\\D\end{pmatrix}=
\begin{pmatrix}-db+nb&-1&\frac{db-nb-n}{db}&-\frac{d^2b^2-d^2b+nd+3ndb-2n^2-2n^2b}{db}\\ d+n&1&-\frac{1}{b}&-\frac{-nb^2-nb-db+d-2n}{b}\\ 0&0&-\frac{d-db+nb+n}{db}&\frac{\left(-d+2n\right)\left(d-db+nb+n\right)}{db}\\ 0&0&0&d-db+nb+n\end{pmatrix}\begin{pmatrix}0\\0\\0\\D\end{pmatrix}
\end{align*}
I used ##D## as a parameter for the solution space because the algorithm handled it best. Since the first line says ##A\sim B## with an appropriate factor, we have also all solutions depending only on ##A.##
 
Last edited:
hmparticle9 said:
My bad. I made a mistake in the title. I have 5 unknowns.
But one of the unknowns is normalization (for scattering this is usually normalized to incident flux.... hence the ratio requested) so your original statement is OK. I recommend looking at the limits of ......α= 0, and perhaps a=0 (single delta fn at origin)
Will return to this later.... don't have the time right now. Shouldn't be too hard methinks.