Is there a Linear Transformation

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
11 replies · 2K views
Chillguy
Messages
12
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


From Hoffman and Kunze:

Is there a linear transformation T from [tex]R^3[/tex] to [tex]R^2[/tex] such that T(1,-1,1)=(1,0) and T(1,1,1)=(0,1)?

Homework Equations


[tex]T(c\alpha+\beta)=cT(\alpha)+T(\beta)[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution


I don't really understand how to prove that there is a linear transformation with these coordinates. I think I begin by defining another arbitrary, linearly independent, transformation such as T(1,0,0)=(1,1). Then I don't really know where to go from here.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Chillguy said:
I think I begin by defining another arbitrary, linearly independent, transformation such as T(1,0,0)=(1,1).

Think about how this helps you along with the requirement that T is a linear transformation. For example, what does your requirement that having the transformation of another linearly independent vector in R3 give you?
 
Orodruin said:
Think about how this helps you along with the requirement that T is a linear transformation. For example, what does your requirement that having the transformation of another linearly independent vector in R3 give you?
It would allow me to span R3 with these three vectors
 
... can be written as [tex]T(c\alpha_i+\beta_i)?[/tex]
where alpha and beta are vectors in R3
 
The resulting combination will be a vector in R^2, I think it could be any vector in R^2?
 
[tex]T(v)=T(c*v_1+c*v_2+c*v_3)[/tex]
Which I can then apply the definition of a linear transformation as defined before?
 
Yes! it does! Thank you so much. It makes much more sense now. I just have one other question, why do the vectors need to span all of R^3 in the first place? Is it so the transformation can go to any place in R^2?
 
Unless you specify the transformation for any arbitrary vector in R3 you have not really found a linear transformation from R3 to R2 but only from a two-dimensional subspace. A more complete answer would be: Yes, it exists, but is not unique. (You could have selected any vector in R2 as the image of your third linearly independent vector in R3).