Is there a paradox involving the Dirac equation and commutation with time?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter ginda770
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dirac Dirac equation
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on a paradox involving the Dirac equation, specifically the relationship between the alpha matrices and the Hamiltonian operator H. The Dirac equation is defined as i∂ψ/∂t = Hψ, where H = α·p + βm. The user questions how the alpha matrices commute with the time derivative operator ∂/∂t while not commuting with the Hamiltonian H, ultimately concluding that the question was resolved independently.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Dirac equation and its components
  • Familiarity with quantum mechanics and Hamiltonian mechanics
  • Knowledge of matrix algebra, specifically 4x4 matrices
  • Basic concepts of commutation relations in quantum mechanics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of the Dirac equation in relativistic quantum mechanics
  • Explore the properties of commutation relations in quantum operators
  • Learn about the physical significance of the alpha and beta matrices in the Dirac equation
  • Investigate the role of the Hamiltonian in quantum mechanics and its relation to time evolution
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, particularly those specializing in quantum mechanics and relativistic theories, as well as students seeking to deepen their understanding of the Dirac equation and its implications.

ginda770
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
I was hoping someone could help me with a seeming paradox involving the Dirac equation. I have taken a non-relativistic QM course, but am new to relativistic theory.

The Dirac equation is (following Shankar)

[tex]i\frac{\partial}{\partial t}\psi = H\psi[/tex]

where

[tex]H = \vec{\alpha}\cdot \vec{p} + \beta m[/tex]

([tex]\psi[/tex] is a four component wavefunction and the alphas and beta are 4 by 4 matrices with constant entries)

It seems to me that any alpha matrix (or almost any other 4 by 4 matrix made up of constants) commutes with [tex]\partial/\partial t[/tex], but not with the hamiltonian [tex]H[/tex]. How can this be true? If [tex]\left[\vec{\alpha},H\right] \neq 0[/tex] and [tex]H = i \left(\partial/\partial t\right)[/tex] how can [tex]\left[\vec{\alpha},\partial/\partial t\right]=0[/tex] ? What am I missing?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Never mind, I figured it out. Stupid question. :-p
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K