Is there a way to construct an open set whose boundary is A?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Newtime
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sets
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

A set in a topological space is closed and nowhere dense if and only if it is the boundary of an open set. The boundary of a set A, denoted as ∂A, is defined as the intersection of the closure of A and the closure of the complement of A, which is closed. The proof involves recognizing that if A is closed and nowhere dense, then the interior of A is empty, confirming that ∂A contains no nonempty open set. The discussion concludes that considering the complement set X - A provides a constructive approach to demonstrate that A can be the boundary of an open set.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic topological concepts such as closed sets, open sets, and boundaries.
  • Familiarity with the definitions of closure and interior in topology.
  • Knowledge of point set topology and its fundamental theorems.
  • Ability to perform set operations and understand their implications in a topological context.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of closed sets and their boundaries in topological spaces.
  • Learn about the concepts of nowhere dense sets and their implications in topology.
  • Explore the relationship between open sets and their complements in various topological spaces.
  • Investigate advanced topics in point set topology, such as the Baire category theorem.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of topology, and anyone interested in the foundational aspects of set theory and its applications in topological spaces.

Newtime
Messages
347
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Prove: a set in a topological space is closed and nowhere dense if and only if it is the boundary of an open set.

Homework Equations


Basic definitions of closed, nowhere dense, open and boundary.

The Attempt at a Solution


One direction is easy. Let A \subset X be a subset in a topological space. Since \partial A = \bar{A} \cap \overline{X-A} and the (finite) interesection of closed sets is closed, the boundary is closed. We also have another interpretation of the boundary. Namely, \partial A = \bar{A} - \text{int}(A). The boundary is nowhere dense since the interior is the largest open set so deleting it means the boundary contains no nonempty open set.

I'm having trouble with the other direction. It seems necessary to do it by construction since there is no general criteria to conclude some random set is a boundary of an open set other than using the definitions, which is how most proofs go in point set topology. However, we know nothing about the set a priori or even about the space, so I'm pretty confused. I think all I need is a (small) nudge in the right direction and any help is appreciated. Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Anyone?
 
I figured it out. For anyone else stuck on this question: if A is a closed nowhere dense set, consider the set X-A.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K