Is there permanent size loss in metals from contraction?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the phenomenon of size changes in extruded anodized aluminum tracks used for automatic pool covers, particularly focusing on whether there is a permanent size loss due to thermal expansion and contraction over time. Participants explore the implications of temperature changes on the dimensions of the aluminum and the potential effects of constraints from surrounding concrete.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that the observed gaps between aluminum sections may indicate a loss of size during the expansion and contraction process, questioning if the aluminum shrinks permanently.
  • Others propose that the concrete surrounding the aluminum may be expanding over time, potentially contributing to the observed gaps, especially if the installations are on new pools.
  • It is noted that when metal is heated and cooled uniformly and unconstrained, it should return to its original dimensions, but if constrained, it may yield and change shape without a change in volume.
  • Some participants argue that the strength of the concrete compared to aluminum could lead to a permanent reduction in the aluminum's dimensions if installed without gaps.
  • A mathematical formula for calculating the change in length of aluminum due to temperature changes is provided, indicating that a significant expansion could occur with temperature increases.
  • Concerns are raised about whether leaving gaps between aluminum sections could prevent potential buckling or distortion of the track.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying viewpoints on the causes of the observed gaps, with some attributing it to the aluminum's thermal behavior and others to the concrete's expansion. The discussion remains unresolved, with no consensus on whether there is a net size loss in the aluminum tracks.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge the complexity of the situation, including the potential for multiple factors influencing the observed gaps, such as the properties of different concrete mixes and the specific installation conditions.

Gary Weller
Messages
15
Reaction score
8
I install automatic pool covers for a living. The tracks that our cover rides on are composed of extruded anodized aluminum. These tracks come in 22' lengths. Usually there is more than one section of track, set end to end, on a given side of the pool. We drill and anchor these sections to concrete decks with NO gap between.

Several years down the road, we notice that there is now a 1/8" - 1/2" gap between the sections. These systems are installed in the heat of the Summer and we usually come back to the jobs in the same heat. If that's the case, does this mean that there is some sort of loss happening during the expansion/contraction process that happens between the seasons and hot days/cold nights?

I know that there's potential for deck heaving and expansion and contracting of the concrete, but this has been seen across the board and there's no way that so many different stones and concrete mixes have the same expansion/contraction ratio.

I guess my end-all questions are "Is there Net size-loss throughout the expansion/contraction process? If the aluminum is 10 units long at 100º, then 9 units long at 50º, but only returns to 9.9 units long when brought back to 100º, where did that .1 unit of length go? Is it gas loss that allows the aluminum atoms to get closer together?"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Engineering news on Phys.org
Gary Weller said:
I install automatic pool covers for a living. The tracks that our cover rides on are composed of extruded anodized aluminum. These tracks come in 22' lengths. Usually there is more than one section of track, set end to end, on a given side of the pool. We drill and anchor these sections to concrete decks with NO gap between.

Several years down the road, we notice that there is now a 1/8" - 1/2" gap between the sections. These systems are installed in the heat of the Summer and we usually come back to the jobs in the same heat. If that's the case, does this mean that there is some sort of loss happening during the expansion/contraction process that happens between the seasons and hot days/cold nights?

I know that there's potential for deck heaving and expansion and contracting of the concrete, but this has been seen across the board and there's no way that so many different stones and concrete mixes have the same expansion/contraction ratio.

I guess my end-all questions are "Is there Net size-loss throughout the expansion/contraction process? If the aluminum is 10 units long at 100º, then 9 units long at 50º, but only returns to 9.9 units long when brought back to 100º, where did that .1 unit of length go? Is it gas loss that allows the aluminum atoms to get closer together?"
Welcome to the PF.

Very interesting question! My initial guess is that the concrete is expanding over time, but others may have other ideas. Are these all new pools? if you install the cover hardware on a new pool, it seems plausible that the concrete structure around the pool can expand over time. But if this happens even on old pool retrofits, that would shoot that theory down...
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Gary Weller
If a piece of metal is heated and cooled uniformly and unconstrained, it will return to the exact original dimensions when cooled. However if the ends are constrained when heated, the metal will become shorter and fatter when cooled. The metal has yielded, as if squeezed in a press, but the volume is unchanged.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Gary Weller, Rx7man and berkeman
Aerospaceenginer said:
If a piece of metal is heated and cooled uniformly and unconstrained, it will return to the exact original dimensions when cooled. However if the ends are constrained when heated, the metal will become shorter and fatter when cooled. The metal has yielded, as if squeezed in a press, but the volume is unchanged.
I yield to the better idea! :biggrin:
 
I think that's the right conclusion.. since there was no gap between them, and the strength of the concrete is so much higher than the aluminum, it is in fact shrinking the aluminum.. I would venture a guess that if you installed them with 1/8th gap between them, you'd probably still have a 1/8th gap later.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Gary Weller and berkeman
This is the principle behind "flame bending". If you heat one side of a pipe, the colder side will be a constraint. When cooled, the pipe will be bent towards the heated side. This is also called metal shrinking, but in reality a local area gets thicker and shorter. The volume is unchanged.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Gary Weller
You can calculate how much a length of aluminium might expand and contract as it heats up..

dl = L0 α (thot - tcold)

where
dl is the change in length (meters)
L0 is the initial length (meters)
α is the coefficient of expansion for aluminium (22.2 * 10-6 m/m.k)
(thot - tcold) is the change in temperature (C/K)

So if you installed a 22ft/7m length when the temperature was say 20C and it was heated by the sun to say 50C (?) then the change in length works out at about 4.5mm (bit over 1/8th inch).

Do the gaps cause any problems?

If you leave an 1/8th inch gap between lengths you might stop any potential buckling/distortion of the track.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: NascentOxygen, Vanadium 50, Gary Weller and 1 other person
CWatters said:
You can calculate how much a length of aluminium might expand and contract as it heats up..

dl = L0 α (thot - tcold)

where
dl is the change in length (meters)
L0 is the initial length (meters)
α is the coefficient of expansion for aluminium (22.2 * 10-6 m/m.k)
(thot - tcold) is the change in temperature (C/K)

So if you installed a 22ft/7m length when the temperature was say 20C and it was heated by the sun to say 50C (?) then the change in length works out at about 4.5mm (bit over 1/8th inch).

Do the gaps cause any problems?

If you leave an 1/8th inch gap between lengths you might stop any potential buckling/distortion of the track.
That is amazing. I'm pretty proficient in Math and Astronomy, but Physics is still somewhat new to me. This is such a fun conversation for the guys in my office right now. I've always theorized a loss in length, but my boss was skeptical. This puts Science behind it, which I always knew was there; I just never took the time to ask the right people. Thank you so much. This is great.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Vanadium 50, Greg Bernhardt and berkeman

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
23
Views
7K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
10K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
29K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
10K