Is there proof that black holes really exist?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the existence of black holes and the alternative concept of gravastars as a potential explanation for gravitational phenomena. It highlights the detection of gravitational waves by LIGO as significant evidence for black holes, though it notes that this does not constitute definitive proof. The conversation also explores the idea that the center of a black hole may be a massive ball of dark energy, which offers a more intuitive understanding of these cosmic entities. Overall, the discussion emphasizes that while black holes are widely accepted, reasonable alternatives have not been entirely ruled out.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of gravitational wave detection techniques, specifically LIGO.
  • Familiarity with the concepts of black holes and singularities in astrophysics.
  • Knowledge of dark energy and its properties in cosmology.
  • Basic grasp of alternative theories in astrophysics, such as gravastars.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of gravitational wave detection and the LIGO experiment.
  • Explore the theoretical framework of gravastars and their implications in astrophysics.
  • Study the properties and effects of dark energy in the universe.
  • Investigate alternative theories to black holes and their scientific validity.
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, astrophysicists, and science enthusiasts interested in the nature of black holes and alternative theories in cosmology.

edguy99
Gold Member
Messages
449
Reaction score
28
Astronomy news on Phys.org
There are a number of observations that confine an astronomical amount of mass to a minisule volume of space. It does not require a super computer to calculate the escape velocity at the border of these regions is the speed of light. That is pretty powerful evidence, but, not quite proof. Then again, science is not in the business of proof. Scientists are generally content to settle for ruling out reasonable alternatives.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: russ_watters and patellar-myotatic
A search of the internet suggests that there are reasonable alternatives have not been ruled out in the case of black holes, i.e.. http://www.nature.com/news/2005/050328/full/news050328-8.html

The Gravastar would be slightly larger then a black hole but does not appear to be ruled out in anything I could find. The idea that the centre of a black hole is a massive ball of dark energy seems a much more sensible explanation rather then going into explanations that seem to defy common sense. Since dark energy by its very nature is repulsive, rather then attractive like normal mass, means you don't have to deal with force that grows unbounded towards the supposed singularity at the centre of a black hole.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Anthony DiGrazia and Demystifier

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
907