Is there such thing as an absolute measurement?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the concept of absolute measurements and the philosophical implications of quantifying objects. It begins by questioning whether absolute measurements exist outside of human perception, particularly when considering quantum scales where exact points for measurement may not be defined. Participants debate the nature of counting versus measuring, using the example of counting pennies to illustrate the uncertainty inherent in quantifying discrete objects. The conversation shifts to the distinction between defined and measured quantities, highlighting that the speed of light is now defined as a constant (299,792,458 m/s) rather than measured, which raises questions about the nature of measurement itself. The role of atomic clocks in defining time and how this relates to the concept of absolute measurement is also discussed, emphasizing that even highly accurate measurements have inherent uncertainties. Ultimately, the thread concludes that while absolute measurements are rare and often rely on defined standards, the complexities of measurement, uncertainty, and the definitions we create for units of measurement are central to understanding quantities in both theoretical and practical contexts.
  • #51
I found this to be almost (but not really) on topic:

1617287785-20210401.png

(Source: https://www.smbc-comics.com/comic/reference)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #52
Philosophically, I don't think you can have such a thing unless you are "measuring" large scale quantities. Even then, there is always the possibility of some sort of uncertainty or error.
 
Back
Top